trjh2k2
TBone
trjh2k2

I think this whole article, and a lot of the commenters are missing the point that was being made. Hulst didn't say that more polygons = deeper characters. What he DID say, as far as I understood it, was that better specs means less constraints involved in expressing the deepness that already exists in a well

On one hand, I partly agree with you, as far as feeling like devs and gamers are not inherently racist, and I think it would be a step back to need a "black games" and "white games" section-

People would have no issue playing a game with a gay lead if the game didn't make a point of it.

I can understand why a game like this would fail. It's too... vague. Unless my understanding of it is wrong, I just see a big deathmatch with a deep character editor.

Holy ads batman. Can't get the whole article/video for x number of seconds of advertising....? I'm all for using ads on the web, but there's a point where they get to be too invasive.

I honestly think that there's tons of potential for competitive entertainment software on television, but I think the biggest failing so far is trying to associate with sports. Video games are not and never will be sports. They so not share a common audience. Of course sports networks don't want games- games are

It's interesting how indies are in a unique situation where they're both more and less constrained at the same time. They have less resources, man power, money, etc., but they have more creative freedom and such. I enjoy a lot of indie games for this reason- to a point though. I've played enough 2d platformers and

You're certainly not wrong. It really would be hard to come up with something that doesn't have any recycled elements to it, maybe close to impossible, but I'm all for trying.

I see what you mean in terms of comparing games to fashion trends. "Retro" graphics are a great example of a visual fad right now.

I see a bit of irony in what you said.

To be honest, for a lot of people it would lose said bonus points for that reason. I can appreciate that there are a lot of people who like the whole 'anime' style, and I enjoyed it when I was younger, but honestly it's too much now.

I think I can live with the next-gen improvements slowing down, or maybe taking another direction. I say this from the point of view of not wanting to have to buy another computer or console to continue playing currently-released games.

Honestly, I gladly welcome incentives to actually buy a game. Why? Because piracy. Because if you don't convince anyone that their money is well spent, they wont spend the money, but will still want to play the game.

I can understand why some might disagree with the idea behind pre-orders, or even think they're somehow damaging to gamers or the industry, but to go as far as to call it manipulation is an exaggeration. People that buy into pre-orders know what they're doing, and do it by choice- and you're talking about people who

Nobody is being hostile about wanting women in the gaming industry. I'm sure that we want more women in the industry.

There are fewer women in the gaming industry because fewer women have an interest in being in the gaming industry. To call it anything other than that is to push an agenda.

The question isn't why, it's why not? Having the *option* to use 4k doesn't prevent high poly, heavy spec, triple-a games from sticking to whatever resolution they want.

What won't happen, but I'd like to see as an answer to both the used game question and why we haven't seen the actual console yet:

Read title- was expecting to be amazed....

You've made two assumptions that are wrong: