trjh2k2
TBone
trjh2k2

You feel that people dislike you for it because they DO dislike you for it. People don't generally like to be reminded of being at a disadvantage. I'm not saying that makes their point of view any more valid than your own, but there's no denying that some people are uncomfortable with those that have a lot more

Aspergers aside, there are tons of reasons, outside of just 'being a loser', that someone might have some difficulty complimenting people. What about cases where one of the two people in a relationship is much more attractive than the other, making it an awkward subject? What about cases where people are

Honestly, at this point, the word 'pretty' has as much meaning as 'nice' or 'good'. It's too vague to carry any weight.

I've always made the assumption that women often have gay friends because it sort of fits the commonly assumed view that if your friends are of the same gender, you're just friends, and if you're friends with the opposite gender, it's because you're attracted to them- the twist being that a gay man (in the eyes of any

But is not a game like Gears of War all about the whole macho GRRRR LOOK AT ME I'M TOUGH AND I SHOOT THINGS regardless of gender?

That's fair.

There's no need to be defensive or aggressive here, this is nothing more than a conversation. Also, you didn't 'coin' the term assailant. That word existed before you used it.

I don't disagree with you on most of your points, but without knowing any more about the situation, I do think that the home could have still been defended either without shooting, shooting less shots, or by aiming to disable instead of kill.

I would argue that "leaning the other way" is not the extreme- shooting someone is extreme. I read the article you provided, and at no point did it suggest that the lady was actually attacked, just that her home was unlawfully entered. Nobody bothered to question what he was trying to get from the house. Nobody

I don't really disagree with the individual points you've made, but I still think the overall purpose of what I said was missed. The goal doesn't have to be incapacitation, but rather a deterrent.

I have no idea what "Krav Maga" is. You've also notably defaulted to the term "assailant", where I never explicitly said that the crime being committed involved attacking anyone.

I had a long response to this, but I'm not going to bother, since I've said all of it before, and don't feel like going over it again.

I don't see Windows or OSX ever preventing you from running any random ol' software you want (Steam included). To do so would defeat the purpose of having a full modern operating system, and a step backwards for computing in general. It would alienate far too many potential customers. It makes me sad that it's even

Discounting every game that uses any form of quick time event is a pretty shallow way to look at those games. The events in games like Heavy Rain, the the Walking Dead are not just timed events, they are choices. The importance is on the fact that you are making a decision that influences the rest of the game, and

I wasn't sure how to interpret the "other storefronts" at first, but this seems like a brilliant idea.

How would a steam OS be any different than buying your games through current OS's app stores?

+1. I was gonna post this, but you beat me to it.

I'll just leave this here:

800 isn't a whole lot of people... can't be hard to find 800 people who agree or believe just about anything. Any idea how these 800 people were selected?