trippple
Trippple
trippple

Why not go there? Cause you did and the passive-aggressive delivery didn’t add any charm.

Those Nordstrom boxer briefs feel great, but they unravel in a few weeks—typical use. I bought a dozen in fall. Only a handful remain. Also, the Nordstrom Rack website is criminally inept about managing user accounts. I spent months trying to leave thier mailing list. I cringe Everytime I see Lifehacker promoting

Those Nordstrom boxer briefs feel great, but they unravel in a few weeks—typical use. I bought a dozen in fall. Only

At first glance at the headline I thought Amplitude Studio’s Endless were making a cameo in the Start Wars universe.

True black is best, but the darker the shade, the more savings even if it isn’t true black. If you need some contrast, green uses the less power than red and blue.

Strongly recommend people avoid ordering from Nordstrom’s website. There is no way to avoid being added to their exceptionally intrusive marketing emails. I received one or more emails every day. They take 7 days to process a request to be removed. I believe this is a sign of the company’s competence and respect

Strongly recommend people avoid ordering from Nordstrom’s website. There is no way to avoid being added to their

what a petty comment.

I don’t mean to discount your armature experience, but I expect media outlet like Lifehacker to interview professionals that proven advice. I’d wager such a resource would only cost the author’s time and effort. To make a larger point: Lifehacker relies too much on “ask the reader” and “the author’s anecdotal

This is a promising new series. I am excited to see where it goes.

Try to keep it classy, Lifehacker.

When I copy/paste the code at checkout the site replied “The promotional code you entered cannot be applied to your purchase.” 

When I copy/paste the code at checkout the site replied “The promotional code you entered cannot be applied to your

Print to PDF.

Seems silly to leave the top spot to a vote. It is time for Lifehacker to pony up some time+money to prove the best, like other respectable publications (Tom’s hardware, consumer reports). Reader votes are cheap and worthless by comparison. We readers ought to demand more.

Seems silly to leave the top spot to a vote. It is time for Lifehacker to pony up some time+money to prove the

It appears the feature is not part of the Google app on android phones. I would be far more likely to use it on the phone than my home assistant. This is an exceptionally useful new feature—especially if it were available on the phone.

I recommend Democrats keep quiet about his campaign promises. I am confident Trump will not follow through with his campaign promises unless people use his unfilled promises to shame him. He will look to low hanging fruit to validate his ego unless we remind him he is a failure.

  1. small sample sizes

How so? I know about social engineering, but I can’t think of a way to manipulate people to use the app to unlock their account on my behalf.

Why is a double lightsaber a spoiler? At best it hints the plot will involve Sith. That isn’t a big reveal in a Star Wars movie.

Kidnapped? I was under the impression Ned’s rebels assumed she was kidnapped but in fact she ran away with Rhaegar.

I was perplexed that google does not include my contacts in the search bar. Turns out the feature has been there, but does not work with my account. All the other personalized results in this article work for me. Anyone know what might be wrong?

Any idea how Google copes with a family of Google users? Must I tie my Google Home device to a particular family member to leverage any sort of deeply-integrated personal tasks like “send an email” or “what does my day look like?” Might the device distinguish voices in my family? Can I introduce myself to get these