trippple
Trippple
trippple

I don’t mean to discount your armature experience, but I expect media outlet like Lifehacker to interview professionals that proven advice. I’d wager such a resource would only cost the author’s time and effort. To make a larger point: Lifehacker relies too much on “ask the reader” and “the author’s anecdotal

This is a promising new series. I am excited to see where it goes.

Try to keep it classy, Lifehacker.

When I copy/paste the code at checkout the site replied “The promotional code you entered cannot be applied to your purchase.” 

When I copy/paste the code at checkout the site replied “The promotional code you entered cannot be applied to your

Print to PDF.

Seems silly to leave the top spot to a vote. It is time for Lifehacker to pony up some time+money to prove the best, like other respectable publications (Tom’s hardware, consumer reports). Reader votes are cheap and worthless by comparison. We readers ought to demand more.

Seems silly to leave the top spot to a vote. It is time for Lifehacker to pony up some time+money to prove the

It appears the feature is not part of the Google app on android phones. I would be far more likely to use it on the phone than my home assistant. This is an exceptionally useful new feature—especially if it were available on the phone.

I recommend Democrats keep quiet about his campaign promises. I am confident Trump will not follow through with his campaign promises unless people use his unfilled promises to shame him. He will look to low hanging fruit to validate his ego unless we remind him he is a failure.

  1. small sample sizes

How so? I know about social engineering, but I can’t think of a way to manipulate people to use the app to unlock their account on my behalf.

I understand it is important that Lifehacker pump out an article as close to these product announcements as possible. I think these recent product releases are strange. I hope to see some more in depth reporting on it.

Sounds like Lifehacker doesn’t understand the purpose of this recent shotgun blast of similar anemic google save features any more than their audience :-(

Would like some details regarding the added value of “save to inbox”. When does Google expect me to use it instead of the (other) “Google Saved” feature? Saving a page to the inbox creates an unchangable entry that is the URL saved. There is no way for the user to supply any other information—not even a title or

The Inbox Android app is great. Wish they would reconsider some of the webpages design. The web page seems to think composing an email something quick and dirty like a text or tweet or status. I go to emails for thoughtful communications. Hence, composing an email needs to be a front-and-center activity. The

May I recommend a closely related topic for a future article?

The two are not at odds. You should check out some of the budgeting articles here at lifejacket. Budgets are about control. Subscriptions do not undermine that.

It seems unfair when a product “lifetime” ends and all the design is recycled into a “new” product. How do you define 1.1 and 2.0?

Migrating from a subscription model makes sense. Migrating to a subscription model sounds like “bait and switch”.

Here is an idea for SmartAsset: try publishing your data in something less opaque than an image. It is 2015 and I’d like to find my city in the browser with control+f.

I expected more from the article based on the title. The article mentions a long history, but only offers a few anecdotes from the feud. Lifehacker is welcome to write longer, more substantial stories if the topic requires it. “Buy within my budget. Ignore the scandals.”