Ah, shit, meant to say “its men.” Re-wrote comment altogether for clarity.

“If only our men had also defeated a bunch of Yankees 150 years ago.”—Texas residents right now

Damn. People under Royal control marched into Indian territory and ultimately devastated the Indians, and then the Indians had to pay homage to the people who destroyed them? Harsh.

“Can hockey season finally start so I can stop pretending like I care about this team?”

The game depicted in this .gif

Ty Law drops that Kurt Warner pass for an incompletion instead of intercepting it and returning it for a touchdown in Super Bowl 36. The Panthers succeed on one of their two failed two-point conversion attempts in Super Bowl 38. McNabb doesn’t throw that horrendous redzone interception in Super Bowl 39. DARRELL BEVELL…

None of what you said indicates that he *did* meet the guys. Try harder.

+3 denials

Oh! Almost forgot:

Starting lineup:

As the saying goes, “they stole their logo from Walgreens, their team from Montreal, and their fans from Baltimore.”

Did you miss the 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 seasons?

His receivers weren’t that impressive in those seasons, true, but those Super Bowl teams did have great defenses. Ironically, it was once Brady got his elite receiving casts (Moss, Welker, Gronkowski, Hernandez) that the Patriots stopped winning Super Bowls...because the defenses declined at that time and were largely…

It’s cute how you act like Brady—with his scant 145 total passing yards in Super Bowl 36, and sloppy “21/41 for 201 yards” line in the first round of the 2003-04 playoffs, and “meh” 236 yard total against a gassed Eagles team in Super Bowl 39—was the one leading the Patriots to victory throughout the postseason all…

Aaron Rodgers is better than him. Assuming that Peyton Manning’s slump at the end of last season was primarily due to an injury that he’s since fully recovered from, I also consider him to (still) be better than Brady.

Well, if you define “greatest” to mean “most victorious,” then there’s no debate to be had. But I’d think it’s clear that the definition of “greatest” has to primarily incorporate the player’s skill into the equation; otherwise, we’d have to concede to bizarre statements like “Trent Dilfer was greater than Dan…

There’s no doubt that he’s a great quarterback, but I still see people saying he’s currently, at this very moment, THE best quarterback in the game, which is horseshit. I’m not saying he isn’t good, just that there is no logically tenable case to be made that he’s better than all others.

I was the greatest player of my generation

/cue Bears fans desperately digging for “evidence” to frame Cutler for rape

Also, God bless EDP.