trianglekitty
Trianglekitty
trianglekitty

Granted, I DID just get scratched in the cornea by a cat today...but I don’t really see why people are saying the game is more colorful? It looks brown and drab to me, just like every Fallout. Maybe a slightly lighter shade of brown and drab, but still..ick.

I am not at all proud of anything that follows...

Already posted this to someone else, but..

It’s not always sexual, though. No more than kissing is always sexual...sometimes a kiss is for comfort, many times it’s just habit, and sometimes it’s lustful. Pet play CAN be sexual, but that doesn’t make it sexual all the time, anymore then we consider a kiss to always be sexual and inappropriate for public. I’m

I was just at a major animal hospital with my cat the other day (the University of Penn...he needed a MRI.) Within an hour two different people came in with ‘service animals.’ Both were goldens and both wore service dog vests.

Even if they never escape and cause harm, there’s no way she’s keeping them with adequate space and enrichment. Reds are big animals who deserve better than what basically amounts to a kennel.

I think I’m the only person who owns but has never played through this game. I WANT to play it, but for some reason the mechanic with the sword either does not work in my copy or I’m blind to only its particular spectrum. I can’t find *shit* in that game. Sure I can hold my sword up, but there’s no nice beam of

I have SPD (can’t stand certain textures of clothes, still sometimes walk on my toes, etc.) For me, weirdly, it isn’t so much texture with food but appearance. I can NOT eat or look at anything small and round like peas. Especially if a single pea is separated from the rest of the group...for whatever reason it makes

I know this will be in the greys, so I’m typing it mostly for myself.

I don’t disagree, but feel he could have used another word that wouldn’t be so easy to misinterpret. Call people out for their bullshit, yes, but don’t bring appearance into it (or use a word that makes it unclear if you are indeed mocking their appearance.) In other words, let’s all be clear when we ruthlessly tear

So shouldn’t selling ANY PS or game console be banned, as eBay can’t be sure the seller erased any content? Or what about things like a ereader?

I actually still prefer printed guides over gamefaqs or wikis. It’s just easier for me to find what I’m looking for and the side quests are often mixed right in with the main quest (where in a faq or wiki they tend to be in a stand-alone location.) I also enjoy flipping through bios and descriptions of enemies without

I still have my copy too! I’m the type who absolutely hates both running in circles or finding out later that I missed something cool, and I don’t have the time or patience to replay a game. Plus I just like guides...I like enemy profiles and bios and such. I can remember being pissed as hell over the damn thing. To

I’m a little confused because the rule cited says ‘unauthorized copies.’ So I can see a CD of an album, but not a copy of the CD, yes? The demo was authorized at the time it was put on the machine, so...can a company retroactively say something the customer legally obtained is now unauthorized?

At no point were we discussing preferences.

Should people lie about allergies? No. Does the fact that some people do make any difference to a cook’s responsibility to serve the customer what is promised? Also no. The fact is that we DON’T fundamentally disagree, but you’re the one saying the cook deserves less blame for his actions then the lying customer when

Excuse: attempt to lessen the blame attaching to a fault or offense. In your own words, you are directly saying that the cook or server deserves LESS blame then a person who claims a false allergy. You are lessening their blame or responsibility due to the actions of another. That’s the literal definition of an

If the actions of others aren’t an excuse, then why did you say people claiming false allergies deserve MORE of the blame then the people actually preparing the food? Why should the person actually in charge of ensuring the customer gets what they ordered be deserving of LESS blame than someone who never touched that

No, the servers and cooks are to blame. The whole point of this article is that a bunch of a people claiming nonexistent allergies is NOT an excuse to ignore such requests, because you never known when the allergy is real. If a customer doesn’t want something, don’t serve it to them, and don’t worry about ‘why’ they

Right? I WANT to like him, and I don’t even mind the yelling TOO much...it’s the constant repeating every blasted word. He’ll say the same thing five or six times in a row and it just sets my nerves on edge.