I wouldn’t call that “logic”.

And you probably deserve one too. Just pray it’s not the new BMW M3!

Thanks, I love you too.

I’m sorry it could have been construed this way. I know what comments I write here, and I know I’m never in attack mode, it’s just not my thing - and really, this isn’t Twitter, few things written in posts here deserve any vitriol, apart maybe from that black-paint-over-BMWs yesterday :-)

Is it? Because that’s not what I got from the article (and given the author’s response, if that was the case, I’d have expected him to point out my missing that very important point.)

Well, I’m called stupid as fuck and other niceties, so I guess it gets under my skin a wee bit.

And I have no problem with Ford giving more cars, giving hundreds of them even. I also don’t have the slightest problem with them recouping their investment many times over - that’s what good management of a corporation supposes.

That’s of course what I meant, and I thought it was obvious, but... no?

“Yes, butcomments like that are stupid as fuck. Of course everyone knows the company is trying to get people to feel warm and fuzzy about them.”

Altruism doesn’t exist, people give to charity because it benefits themselves in some way.

They could have given him the car quietly, that’d have been a gift.

Thanks.

Anyone else surprised that the same company could come up with the awesomely beautiful E and... this?

Automakers love owner loyalty

If there was a case where Betteridge’s Law of Headlines applies, this is a textbook one.

Those were real beauties, weren’t they.

I feel your pain. That truck is really ugly :-)

Mom had a 205, I loved that thing. And maybe we just got lucky bit it hardly saw the dealership after we got it.

Which ones? They’re little more than rebadged Peugeots...

Oh, I hated myself on the very same day, no need to wait :-)