@lucasway89: You're acting like there's no situation in which it's justifiable to shoot a person. Guns are indeed designed to be able to kill, however, they're designed to be used for just purposes.

@ironicmind13: The Federalist Papers and the Constitution were based on principles that hold true today. The right to keep and bear arms, for example, is due to attempts by the British government to take those arms from our citizens, denying their natural right to self defense and defense against tyrrany in…

@d-avid: Ah, but public transportation exists, so why are we allowing all these irresponsible drivers to kill 40,000+ people a year on the roads in the USA when we could have government regulated and licensed professional drivers shuttling us everywhere on buses and trains?

@d-avid: Read Federalist 46 and 28. Here's a link to 46.

@d-avid: Look up Britain's violent crime rates post-gun-ban. Sure, "gun crimes" went down, but every form of violence there has skyrocketed since.

@d-avid: You should really read the Federalist Papers before you make any more uneducated comments.

@Heilage: Cars kill more people than guns a year in the USA...should we ban cars?

@liveinabin: An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

@Llew: Thank goodness we're not Europe, then, eh?

@d1zzle: My thoughts exactly. I don't even like looking down the barrel of a totally disassembled gun to ensure it's cleaned, much less rotating and assembled gun to point directly at my chest.

@Bant: Electric Burger: Totally disagree. What do you think when you see somebody@aol.com?

@TetraGenesis: Actually, they stitched two takes together. When the camera goes through the dark tunnel, they spliced it.

@Rhodizzle: +1

Well, that puts a whole new spin on The Wet Bandits.

@ps61318: Maybe they just raise their kids to stay off other people's property and not do stupid things that could result in personal injury.

@verspasian: 25% plus some other fees goes to the lawyers. The rest goes to internet privacy advocacy groups.

@nightwheel: No.

@Wireless Joe: He tought me that it's okay to include Cat Stevens in your "sanity" rally, even though he publicly (and repeatedly) advocated killing a Salman Rushdie for criticizing Islam.

@MrSmoofy: Take a look at hexagonal rifling like the H&K P7 has.

@midnightz: It's easy to stand in judgment when the only information you get is what the liberal media feeds you.