@Auzburner: Fun hater?

@adamparka: I think it's interesting, and the comparison was not lost on me (even before you posted this convenient comparison).

@Tyrunn: It's for your own good. Trust the government.

@Tyrunn: We out nanny-stated the Great Nanny State? Wow.

@NyQuilPillz: Learn to spell, punctuate, and capitalize, foreigner.

Rushing headlong into the neutral zone is the surest way to fail the Kobayashi Maru test.

@benizdead: You mean, for all YOU knew, they could have irradiated the entire planet.

I'm offended that this Brit knows more about our banking system than I do.

@marballe: Did I stutter?

@SeraphX2: Apples and oranges.

@marballe: Give something back? Seriously?

@brdaykin001: The world-building is what set it apart, I think. It was 100% believable as a potential future. The relatively weak ending didn't ruin what I felt was a great ride.

I feel really bad for these Apple employees...4chan will hear about this any minute now.

@brdaykin001: Yeah, it's kind of a slow-motion pre-apocalypse. Society is still partially functional in that movie.

@rebeldevil: Let's eat him!

@KeyserSöze: I'd classify it as a toss.

Yellow screens...so THIS is why Foxconn started allowing bathroom breaks.

This video is just proof of what we always knew: Android fanboys are seriously passive aggressive.

@jamjen: Thank you kind sir or madam.

@Ccomfo1: There's certainly room for debate over what should be legal, and what should be restricted. I think certain laws, however, are blatantly unconstitutional, such as California's arbitrary restrictions on "assault weapons" that are really just restrictions on cosmetic features, or Chicago's handgun ban,…