Case by case with my husband:

I don’t share most/any of my passwords with my wife for one simple reason.

Getting married does not mean surrendering private autonomy.

Wow, man. It’s like talking to a brick wall. You’re obviously not actually listening to anything I’m saying. Again, it seems petty and cheap to you because you’ve only been in situations where asking for individual checks was the abnormal thing to do. But in a place where splitting a check evenly is the abnormal thing…

NOOOO: ““Xdolls is not a sex shop. It’s a place that generates money and where you rape a woman.””

What makes it tacky if it’s not harming anyone? You’re not giving me any reason why it’s tacky. You’re just proclaiming from on high that it is. And if that’s the case, if it’s truly not harming anyone to split checks, then the only reason you have to say that it’s tacky is because it’s the cultural norm to not do so…

But why when you can just shove the handle (!) of a small spoon under the lid, use it as leverage until you hear the satisfying “plopp” and be done with it. *shrugs*

Dude...seriously. I’m telling you that it’s a cultural difference. Literally no one in the part of the world I live in splits checks that way. You only think it’s “tacky” and “childish” because you’re used to doing things differently. I don’t care about the extra 3 dollars or 3 euros or whatever. But it’s SO much…

THANK YOU. One of my friends told me that a friend of hers tweeted that being an adult meant identifying more with Sally Field in “Mrs. Doubtfire” and they were right. I rewatched the movie after that and dammit Miranda Hillard gets a raw deal.

Yes, absolutely. There’s the scene where she’s talking to Mrs. Doubtfire (very private thoughts about her marriage) and she says “I didn’t like the person I had to be when I was around him.” or something like that. In other words, she had to be his mother. She had to be the killjoy. And the whole time he’s getting…

Sally Field in Mrs Doubtfire.

I find it increasingly hard to enjoy a lot of movies I used to enjoy — especially those centered around relationships — because they celebrate really fucked-up power dynamics.

This article is...kind of annoying. She’s not “Canadian Rosa Parks”...wtf kind of weird thing is that to say. Not only is she her own person, but is that “Canadian” qualifier supposed to somehow assert America’s awesomeness or something? These are people, not bacon. 

She’s not the Canadian Rosa Parks. She’s Viola Desmond.

Damn Michael B Jordan can even make roofs wet (I’m so sorry, I’m so sorry for this joke, I’m so sorry)

Happily maried for years I’m going to go ahead and say

should we force parents to vaccinate their child because we inherently know that their reasoning is nonsense?

Maybe it’s because i am an introvert and don’t enjoy prolonged casual interactions with people in general, but:

Yeah, but that’s not how journalism ethics works. The story had credibility but the reporting.... didn’t. No real sources, no real facts to report. I get that was incredibly frustrating for Jezebel (and the other ex-gawker sites), but that doesn’t give them a license to just keep stirring the pot publicly on the hopes…

Here’s the simple fact: The Washington Post did journalism the right way, and Jezebel did not.

All you have to do is look at Chloe’s face...she’s what, 5? And yet she already knows her daddy is a complete and total douche.