totenglocke42-old
Totenglocke42
totenglocke42-old

You totally do NOT grasp how technologically advanced the PS3 was (sorta still is).

Well the PS3 won't be updated for awhile - and the 360 most likely won't either (though it needs it due to still using DVD's). The problem is, both systems sold at a loss for long enough that they need to stick around to make up money. The Wii never sold at a loss and now that the PS3 is profitable, Nintendo can

The fact is that everyone is going to need to pay more to fix the deficit (as well as spending being cut). However, I have a serious issue with the "rape the rich" theme that's so common because of people wanting to vilify someone that they're jealous of (I make around $35k a year, so I'm definitely NOT rich). My

It's not about framing - it's about asking an honest question.

Three characters will solve all those blu-ray problems for you: PS3.

So being under 18 means she can't be attractive?

Plus she said it didn't hurt!

Sales tax has nothing to do with it because Amazon doesn't have nearly as much COST. Plus, Amazon follows the business view of make a small per item profit on a metric TON of items sold.

Exactly. Borders did just fine in the books department - it was the absurd markups on movies and music that pushed people away.

He also doesn't realize that Photoshop is inherently something to do on a tablet (look at all the people who use a Wacom tablet to draw in Photoshop). Try doing programming on a tablet or writing a research paper or doing statistical analysis.

Yes, but Fisker is showing that you can have high performance, style, and high mpg, without an obscene price (not saying $95,000 is cheap, but you're getting much more for your money than with a Tesla). BMW also has a similar car in the works (high performance car doing 0-60 in about 4 seconds and getting 60+ mpg)

I'm not claiming to have "facts" pertinent to a lawsuit.

"loans" that they'll never repay that they only needed because *wait for it* - they're failing. A company with a good product doesn't need government subsidies to stay in business (and they're hardly a new company, so you can't argue that this is just to help them get off the ground).

First off - one of your examples for how they were "intentionally" breaking it was a guy leaning against the car and the window broke. News flash: people lean against cars all the time and I've never seen a window break as a result. That's just poor build quality there.

All we know is, he's called The Stig!

If you consider normal use of a car to be 'intentionally breaking' a car, then you're one highly delusional fanboy.

Quite true. Sadly what Elon forgets is that each host individually (not even counting the BBC itself) can buy and sell the whole Tesla company a couple times over.

First, their claim of 245 MPC is with a strong tailwind with the car barely moving (just like how highway MPG tests are done at 45 mph - around 60% of actual highway speed).

No, didn't you hear? They got government subsidies for their failing company (translation: they're forcefully taking money from your wallet to stay afloat).

Impressive. I laughed quite hard....