Oh c'mon. It's not the years, it's the mileage...

But that would require having a female protagonist. We all know how well that turned out hte first time...

That wasn't my point. It's not absurd to ask how you understand it when people literally spend parts of their career learning the system. Simply reading a wikipedia or a government site does not help you understand how Copyright actually works in the corporate world. So how do you know? That was my question, and you…

How do you know? Are you a musician, artist, a lawyer or someone else that needs to know the ins and outs of this particular law set? Serious question, not trying to be a "smartass." I took several classes on this as a Graphic Designer, so if you want to get into an interpretation battle of what copyright refers to…

lol yes I know. He's a staple of all of Anderson's films. Wow, I didn't realize actually liking the guy and stating why I think he'd become so prevalent lately would turn into "auto correcting internet," mode. Go figure.

That's cause Rushmore came out in 1998 lol. I specifically mentioned the 00's. Someone else mentioned and I agree that it started ball rolling.

Absolutely true!

It's the "no fucks given" attitude. He has zero issues with making fun of himself or the roles he's played. He also is notorious for not wanting to do sequels as he believes they detract from the original and that the performances suffer because they aren't as fresh the second time around, Ghostbuster II was dead…

I think that's my issue with bringing in "prequel" characters into an established lore. You know they weren't around, obviously. If they aren't around or mentioned you know something happened to their character. The status quo answer is what you described. She has a confrontation with Vader and she loses. That tears…

So, none of the following -

I would agree, but I don't think it was necessarily out of the ordinary. In terms of what we see as unconventional body types, it is still just a fantasy. Although I'm not sure what you mean when it comes to other entertainment media having a more diverse and broad audience. Mostly because in the case of my gaming…

Aren't you a little short for an archer?

"I just wanted to destroy something beautiful"

Hahaha oh yea. Dad is a nuclear engineer and my mom was a science teacher. Their first date was actually Star Wars in 1977. I never stood a chance lol.

Wait, wait. Don't stop. Finish the sentence. You're correct. You have to energize the gas/liquid medium to create the plasma. It is one of the 4 fundamental states of matter. It is also one of the most abundant forms of ordinary matter in the universe.

And then referring to them as Droids later. The dialogue is pretty inconsistent. They also started calling them blasters, blast pistols, etc throughout. They weren't called laser rifles, or guns. So I agree it's a little wacky. However, it wasn't the EU guys that came up with this stuff. The ILM teams did. It's been…

No he's not. And no it wasn't. Riot made nothing publicly available. Riot believed him to be in violation of their rights and removed the stream. Just because you don't understand how copyright works or how this unfolded is no longer my problem. Your complete lack of understanding and my attempts to help you…

No worries lol. I'll always fight that fight. It's actually the same discussion with my firends that got my now fiance` interested in hanging out with me more. If it hadn't been for knowing that difference...I kid on that end, but seriously it was when she realized I knew my ****.

Um...A WiiU nor 3Ds come with buttons for the following -

Except the guns in Star Wars don't use "light" as bullets. They use a pack of gas (traditionally Tibanna) that was then super-heated into plasma. This plasma was then discharged at high velocities and at varying energy levels of lethality (set for stun!). That's why they were called Blaster Bolts, and not lasers.…