never liked the shoebox chevies, but I am a fan of the 2 door wagon concept.
never liked the shoebox chevies, but I am a fan of the 2 door wagon concept.
so you and your old high school science teacher sold Meth, right? is that you Jessie?
far from pristine, the seller even calls it a 10 footer.
bet all the suspension bushings are shot, the water pump and alternator are about to go, looks like a repaint, so you might be ok there, these were known for the paint peeling off, especially the metallic paint ones. the interior is just about to go on this one…
1976 Ford LTD station wagon.
oh, the 3.8 will live forever. it is the rest of the car that will collapse around you like a costa rican sinkhole
is the rear wing a delete option?
chevettes were RWD.
at this point “supply shortages” are almost entirely due to manufacturers choosing to under-order and/or keep the market hungry.
initially they were caused by panic cancellations of long lead items, but that was 3 years ago now and 2.5 years since it was obvious to all concerned that that was a mistake. there has…
if you pay $3-4k for this $1K car, you get what you deserve (a shitty car that is going to shit the bed in about 10k miles. these cars were engineered to last 100-120k miles and then fall apart)
this is a $1000 car, tops. this used car price bubble is complete horseshit.
any late 50's car that isn’t a tri-5 chevy makes me smile. I have never liked them. but the same era Pontiac? huuunnnnngggg sploosh.
the whole superlicence points thing was a Mercedes hissy-fit driven thing over Max getting to F1 at 17.
it needs to go away.
pretty much the only time these teams should be flying is when the south coast teams (southhampton, brighton and Bournemouth) play Newcastle.
everything else the direct bus ride or express train is shorter than driving to the airport, flying and driving to the stadium.
the worst wigs are the female lead and aunt “I should been king”, followed by uncle creepy and the dread head.
exactly, which is why they should have returned for another wet dress rehearsal, but this time taken it all the way to the end the way they were supposed to.
I WIN!!!
F9 is, launch the can monkeys on F9 and dock in space like they did with Apollo....
THE WHOLE POINT WAS IT WAS ALL FLIGHT PROVEN HARDWARE!!!
and, shocker, it failed on the part they never tested (engine chill) at the wet dress due to other failures and then said “fuckit, we never have problems with that part, go for launch!!”
and now their story is “well, that’s the hard part”
right, but my point is, FH could carry the Orion Capsule and Service Module GTO almost fully fueled. the difference between GTO and MTO is not a whole lot and a F9 could meet it in GTO and give it either a boost to MTO or more fuel to get it there for under 10% of the cost.
this whole enterprise has been social welfare…
this was supposed to be the cheap, fast option. non-developmental and using legacy engines and systems. somehow that morphed into $26B and 6 years late and $4B/launch, when SpaceX can launch 40, yes 40, falcon heavies for $4B, and make a profit doing it.
you could do the same moon mission using 1 falcon heavy and one…