“Horton, Here’s a Poo!”
“Horton, Here’s a Poo!”
Drunk and looking for a fight? He’s a pregnancy away from the Irish Triple Crown.
you want to get to the bottom of this?
just a simple man eatin’ stuffed crust and thinkin’ ‘bout his daughter’s tatas
Co-Anchor: Oh wow! Haha seems like Natalie’s having a hard time with that chip! Hahahaha. Hang in there Natalie!
Ahmet then threatened to mow the fucking lawn, take out the goddamn trash, and to remember to not be an asshole and leave the fucking toilet seat up. The other rival manager nodded his head and agreed to the deal.
Just another way they’re Doing It Wrong (TM)
Let’s see.
15K miles? Do you do track day driving every day? I used to do 400 miles/day with my TDI 5 days a week and racked up 100K miles per year of the same kind of mainly highway driving as this Tesla did, and my tires (Yokohama YK420 or 520s I think) used to last me over 50K miles.
The Next Matt Stares
That was no dive. That was “oh, noooooo. I fucked this up.” 100% exasperation and embarrassment.
I’m not sure you understand how the arbitration process works.
Quite clarity. Much understand.
I used to think like you until maybe 15 years ago when I started realizing that the decades and decades of substandard education and institutionalized lack of access to capital will take decades more to overcome. Sure, things are better than when we kept slaves. Things are better since African Americans were given the…
Your response is more or less the dumbest post here and there was some stiff competition going on this article.
I NEVER OWNED A SLAVE AND THIS IS AN IMPORTANT ARGUMENT FOR ME TO MAKE BECAUSE I AM SUPER DUMB
“imagined as being in a position of power”
I hope this article is satirical, cause it’s blistering hot garbage.
Why? The one reason I can see for it in the article boils down to it being a derisive and snarky way to make the same criticism, and you as an employee of Gawker have absolutely zero grounds for trying to tell people not to act in that fashion.
I get why clickbait isn't acceptable to use for some sorts of criticisms, but how do you figure it's not acceptable to use in the case of a misleading headline designed to make people think that a fairly mundane article is not mundane? I take it to mean the same thing. You may not like that it carries with it a much…