0-60 in 9.5 seconds is not fast, by any stretch of the imagination. Please test drive a low mileage Subaru BRZ or Scion FRS and compare them

ok here we go, so I don’t sound like a complete asshole, because I realize that there are still fans of this car, that will defend their purchase. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and values

#1 there are more fun, faster and better handling cars at this price

sorry, not enough care to explain why

sorry. no. fuck this car. it doesnt even deserve proper grammer spellingand punctuation

terrible example.

Better question: Tune/Exhaust M2 with a warranty, or a 997tt with 30k miles for about $5k more? A tuned M2 wouldn’t put the power down as well as a 911 turbo.. but has the warranty advantage

I nominate my M Roadster. Extended leather. Piano black trim

To pick 1: Spyker c8. To pick an affordable one, a 911 turbo with 3 pedals

Ah the classic remove-add color marketing trick

When I read about bench racers comparing 0-60 times I cringe. Anyone who’s actually driven a car with over 400hp flat out and hopefully in the right conditions, knows its all about the 1/4 mile time/trap speed/60 foot time. That is my barometer of someone who knows their shit

do you think it will have rear facing third row seats?

that’s what SHE said

“polesitter” *gigghes

Expected more power out of that displacement and turbo v12. I’d take the quicker rs7 over this

SOMEBODY needs some Austin Martin branded sunglasses. I’m looking at you mr. squinty face

the Vipers are far from refined. hahahhahahahahahahahhahahaha

Now which of these have 3 rows of seats?

I call on Jalopnik to stop accepting vertical video media

My wife had a tc and now an frs 6 speed. I’ve driven the xA. Please take it off the list. The car is a death trap

Cold, wet, bumpy, and narrow. I can’t think of a worse road for this car