That’s clearly what I said.
And because your response isn’t a strawman at all...you’ve totally eviserated me.

Will writing for the 3rd time that I think Clinton’s emails are a problem convince you that that is what I think...or are you going to continue to pretend that I’m interested in ignoring them? And only worried…

What simple fact have ignored,”bro”?

Me: Clinton’s emails are problem, but there are many other public records related problems occurring in this country. If people think Clinton’s emails are a problem, maybe they should think the other stuff is a problen too. You know, for consistency’s sake.

You: Clinton is a…

I don’t give a shit about either candidate. You’re the one laser focused on candidates.

I want people to know that this shit is happening everywhere on every level of gov’t.

I want to call disingenuous folks out on their bullshit, if they only care about it when Clinton does it.
Or I want to trick people into caring…

Holy fucking strawman! This is a bullshit take!

“Pretty sure” is not evidence. Why do facts and reality not matter to you?

Everyone’s trying. But apparently no one is as smart as you, so you’ve decided not to listen to anyone.

PSA: I work in state gov’t, and deal with public records. If you feel your stance is principled on this issue (and not just a rationalization to vote R or anti-Clinton), I would encourage you to look at all the ways your state and local government is being at least equally as negligent when it comes to security and/or…

This is chickenshit pedantry.

You’re a special kind of know-it-all.

Just so WE’RE clear...fabricated and unsubstantiated outside the Fox/Bretibart echo chamber doesn’t count as a serious issue.

Keep fucking that chicken for Trump!