When you exchange even a handshake with someone, you exchange dna. You don’t have to sweat profusely or rip off skin parts to exchange traces of your dna. The victim claimed, she did not shower/clean herself up, before the rape kit was taken. In fact, if she had, taking a rape kit would have been useless. There was…

None of his dna was in her underwear or on her body below the waist, even though she claims she directly went to the police after she had been forcibly penetrated by Kane. Wearing a condom does not prevent dna traces like sweat, hair or skin on the body.

A condom will prevent dna evidence comimg from saliva, sweat, skin, hair? I didn’t know that and neither does anyone who has ever collected dna evidence. There are dna traces of Kane’s dna on the accuser’s shoulder and underneath her fingernails. A slight touch on a bare shoulder or a handshake with longer fingernails…

Great minds think alike. lol

You can not be serious!

You mean, like Carly Fiorina, who did such a great job at HP? Or Sarah Palin, as governor and VP candidate? Julia Pierson, fired as the head of the secret service? Yep, all supremely qualified. See, you shouldn’t make such blank statements, that can be easy countered with examples of woefully unqualified women in…

You can’t have it both ways, arguing to appoint on merit when a woman gets appointed and arguing in favor of quotas whenever a woman gets replaced by a man. The chances, that 9 women or 9 men would occupy the SC seats at the same time on merit alone are pretty close to zero. There have to be enough women and men who…

OK, just remember that, next time men argue that we don’t need quotas, bc we should simply pick the best people for the job. I’m all for it, but every time a man turns out to be the best person for the job, other people call it gender discrimination.

In his FB post, he talked about 60 applicants and a “significant majority” of women, I didn’t see ‘80%’. Where did you get that number?

What do you mean by “secure enough”? Telling men, that their voices would not be heard on the highest court for many years, maybe decades, is not a question of being ‘secure enough’, it’s simply an injustice to exclude half the population from having a voice. That should be clear by now, after feminists argued along…

Are you kidding me, it’s 2015. If women were somehow banned again from the SC, the internet would be in flames!

That’s not the point. Every time a group of men gets selected, the question inevitably arises, why there are no women included (gender discrimination!). Why not answer that criticism this time, by publishing the female to male ratio of the suitable applicants. If it was somewhat around 10:1 or 20:1, no one could argue…

About the RBG quote - if you identify a mistake and are about to correct it, in this case excluding women from the highest court in the land by appointing them to the SC after a long, long time, what would be the merit in repeating the same mistake again, this time with the genders reversed by excluding men from the…

“Berger noted that of the initial six selected scientists, one was male, but he didn’t meet the physical requirements of the job. “

F*** this s**t, I’m packing it in!

The person who made fake outrage almost an art form, should not be outraged by other people faking (?) outrage over her outrageous(?) behavior of mocking disabled people. After all, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

So is the kind of prosecution where it comes down to a he said/she said, but that didn’t keep you from finding Kane guilty right from the start.

“In general, women seem to use SNSs more to explicitly foster social connections. Female participants in a multi-stage study conducted in 2007 to discover the motivations of Facebook users scored higher on scales for social connection and posting of photographs.^[9] Similarly, in a study of blogs maintained in MySpace,…

This can’t work. In the original movies, Damon’s character complains to Clooney’s and Pitt’s character about the fact, that they get to wear all the cool clothes, while he looks like a bum. With 11 women, there would be a huge fight about who gets to wear the Chanel costume and the Louboutins and two hours later, the…

You fuckwit. You demand Kane prove his innocence to remove the stigma. I tried to explain to you, to no avail obviously, that ‘proving innocence’ goes against anything that a just society stands for. Only totalitarian systems accuse people and ask them to prove their innocence.