GEORGE & AMAL: PREGNANT
GEORGE & AMAL: PREGNANT
An Italian who couldn’t find an Italian speaking New Yorker in two days? Mamma mia.
Depression in the clinical sense, or depression as in ‘sad after she missd out on the calendar slam’? One is not like the other. I bet, the members of a certain NY baseball team are depressed too right now.
Woman gets assaulted. Her male friend comes to her aid and fights the attacker. Woman maces attacker’s girlfriend and then she and her friends chase the attacker(s?) down the street. Third party watches the street fight between those two groups and wisely decides not to get in the middle of it. This could have been…
Staaaap using ‘literally’, if you don’t know what it means, dunce! Only ‘#notallmen’ would literally be #notallmen. What you tried to say in your very limited intellectual capacity was something along the lines of ‘basically #notallmen’ or ‘more or less #notallmen’. Glad I could be of help!
If a woman demands oral sex, yet doesn’t want to go down on a dude, she’s not sex positive, nor is she a ‘giving’ person. sex isn’t men ‘performing’ and entertaining women in hopes of getting something back.
You mean feminism 101? I read the cheat sheet - it boils down to *boys bad, women good*. Didn’t cost me a nickel.
Fair enough, but why take dna samples from her genital area then? She claims, she was alone with Kane in that room, so he must have been the only one who violated her according to her accusation.
You do you dude. If I had a nickel, for every time I heard women protest when referred to as ‘girls’... I don’t go down on ‘girls’ and I sure hope a grown woman doesn’t want to getting it on with ‘boys’.
My clarification was with regards to the generalizing headline. Instead of *here are two men* or *some men..* it was *It’s 2015 And Men...*
Humblebrag
Oh what a cunning linguist you are!
...mumbled the dude, when you shoved his face between your legs.
/fixed for clarity
The reaction gif make this hilarious.
I agree, there will never be enough evidence to prosecute the accuser for lying/giving a false statement and unless there is clear cut evidence, no accuser should ever be prosecuted for lying in a rape case. The way I see it, unless people demand video evidence of the encounter in his house, this should be more than…
If she claims Kane penetrated her vaginally and there is no DNA below her waist, how did he pull it off? Again, wearing a condom does prevent semen to show up on a screning, it does not prevent other dna evidence to show up on a rape kit, just like skin, saliva, hair or sweat, even the most miniscule traces of it. As…
Unless he was wearing a fully body condom, preventing him from leaving sweat and skin particles on the victim, the fact that the rape kit came back negative is a huge exculpatory factor, unless you’ve made up your mind beforehand. If it had come back positive with Kane claiming that there was no sex, this would have…