tldreyeroll20
TL;DR *eyeroll* 2.0
tldreyeroll20

Oh, so she’s showing ‘fictional’ skin on the show? Thanks, I didn’t know that.

You think she and her fellow actors get to make choices on the show too?

“Sex doesn’t sell. We’ve been over this. “

Isn’t HTGAWM the show that solely exists to present as many people of different ages, genders, ethnicities and sexual orientations getting it on in various combinations and as often as possible? Not that there is anything wrong with that, but why refusing to be shot in a bra for a magazine spread, all of a sudden?

So I guess Sam Spade is making a comeback

it’s going to take a lot more than a sideline meltdown to sour the Cowboys on Hardy. (And his actions certainly don’t compare to Ratliff’s.)

Agreed.

I feel the same way about boob size. Anything less than a D cup isn’t even worth batting an eyelash, amirite ‘tall lady’?

Well, they mention him now. We’re now arguing, that a dude doesn’t get bashed thoroughly in a comment thread on jezebel? That’s a first! Do you get the irony in this? lol

Most people here acknowledged that this guy is an asshole for giving her chlamydia twice, but by going nuclear, she not only exposed him (good) but also revealed to the world, that she was stupid enough to have unprotected sex with him twice, the second time after she knew that he gave her chlamydia the first time

I don’t think so. The director casted a largely unknown stage actor for the sole purpose of giving the audience the opportunity to see ‘Hitler’ in that mockumentary, without watching a star actor showing his craft (like Bruno Ganz in ‘Der Untergang’, which is the second part of the clip in the article). This is the

The close-caption of that clip does not even come close to the actual dialog. It doesn’t make sense at all. I dont know who did this, but you even fail to mention that the second part of the clip is a montage from a completely different movie (‘Der Untergang’), an Oscar nominated film from 2004. If by this article,

“Of course, this will only help if Hollywood actually wants more women working on movies. Which... “

“ excuse me tom tina, are you in the right place? jeopardy contestants are not supposed to be this hot”

I’d rather feel sorry for him, *if* he is in fact owed that money by law and she still fights him in court.

In the aftermath of the Stefani/Rossdale divorce - prenup or no prenup? That is the question. If not, he might get half the assets under Cali divorce law, no?

“be sure to call me an “outraged crazed fan” at some point “

What would she do without these devil’s tools? She wouldn’t have the platform to communicate/sell with/to the public. She would be the ex gf/wife of famous men, without the means to milk that fame for what its worth.

It is irrelevant to the movie. It would still work. If the main criteria for a filmmaker would be to cast among groups that are underrepresented in Hollywood, then every main actor would either be a gay WOC or a trans person. That’s not the way this works. You have an idea, you write a script and then you cast a bunch

You do know the difference between the author of a book taking artistic license by writing yet another book with the topic of her choosing and the reboot of a movie franchise with an entirely different producer, director and cast? One is not like the other.