Stop letting these companies know and let us have our fun!

Art certainly doesn’t require intent. Art is determined by the viewer, not the creator. And no viewer can know, for sure, the intent of the creator.

🙄

To be pedantic, Adore is not isometric. It has a perspective camera that is held at 3/4 top view.

I don’t think that portraying the original pitch of the game before release as a lie is incorrect or unhealthy. The truth is, they came and said they had something that they did not have. That’s just the reality. No one forced them to pitch something that didn’t exist.

What is with the jittery animation? Is it all mocap? And there are some weird artifacts on the log on her jacket, is that upscaling?

I am curious what the end product will actually look like in practice and what level of detail these places will be at. They seem super dense but what depth is there to that density?

It’s not only him. Many of us are interested in the original pitch and one day, someone will actually make it. Part of the issue is that on every article about this game the same story is told. That they came out, under delivered on big promises, and then turned it around and in post-releases made the game they always…

The one upside, I would say, is materials are far more available, including shields. In botw shields and arrows were pretty hard to come by which inhibited experimentation. This one though, they are everywhere, so you don’t feel as bad trying something that doesn’t work or when things break.

Yeah, same, this is why I didn’t try the cart as I assumed mobility wasn’t changed when fusing items to the shield. I do not understand why they didn’t do that.

Aha you are absolutely correct. I don’t know what I was on about tbh.

The developers made the art for those screens. They expected everyone to see it on them. which I know you know, but I feel it bears repeating.

There is no way it isn’t already being used. Will a completely AI made game be forthcoming? probably not any time soon. But it doesn’t matter, that as a goal post is meaningless for artists’ livelihoods.

That’s pretty funny.

unfortunately, literally true. weird world.

No, not the time it takes. The differentiating factor is that you are a person. And the AI is not. And that fundamental difference has wide implications. By taking a skill that other people have spent time to hone, and have built their career on, it devalues the artists work in a monetary sense. Having another person…

You aren’t taking the time to imitate X artists style, an AI is scraping that artist’s work so it can be black box photoshopped into a new form. Artists are the reason that the ai has anything to produce but they don’t get credit, they didn’t give consent, and they don’t get any money for it. AI art would be great, if…

Not exactly. It has been a thing to make colors. But pre-industrialization most artisans were making their own paints. Post industrialization there were companies, like pantone, who made a business out of making colors, but the key word there is making—not claiming a part of the color spectrum was owned by pantone and…

I mean, why shouldn’t someone be able to make money off of a color? It’s the only way people will make new colors! come on. People need money as an incentive to invent new colors. It’s obvious.

5. public exposure of his abuse resulted in him going into panic defense mode

as soon as I saw the video, I was like, yeah there is 0 chance that is real. It was far too detailed and the type of motion is particularly hard for a headset to predict.