titania126
titania126
titania126

Have been having this fight with the guy I'm seeing who insists that weed enhances his libido. And that's true. Every stoner I've ever dated has been horny as fuck. They've also ALL had extreme difficulties maintaining erections for any length of time. Every single one of them blames it on condoms, and scarily, I

Translation: "We can't afford Annie Leibovitz or anything close to Annie Leibovitz so we are going to hope like hell that these weirdo indie guys will appeal to people on all these free distribution channels so we can get back in black without addressing the fact that our clothes suck."

Lololol I too briefly considered the wax statue version of Ryan Gosling instead of a picture of actual human Ryan Gosling on Getty this morning, but chickened out. Bravo, you!

They are the cutest little girls to ever girl.

Forget Fifty Shades of Grey. THIS is the stuff that is a problem for the BDSM community. If nothing else I hope that film helps start a dialogue about the complexities of this kind of attraction, to protect people drawn to the community who are vulnerable.

I don't know if you're a progressive or a conservative. But you're right, I don't like you! But that's because you're a misogynist, an idiot, and a Tolkien nerd, three things which cross all party lines.

From IMDB, re: the writer of The Boy Next Door.

100% second what was said about wedges. You will be miserable in a regular heel that high.

For most of my 20s, it was about six months, and not on purpose. I'm 29, I want to find a partner and have a family, but generally it seems like the initial rush lasts about three months, I struggle for a month or two as things emerge that just don't fit, and then cut bait a month or two after that. I used to worry a

Your comment has no value. It has no point. It is wrong on its face. It is based on a false premise. I would no sooner produce a thoughtful response to your comment than I would respond to a creationist, an astrologer, or a golden retriever. You are WRONG. You don't need to be responded to, you need to be reeducated

I know him personally, in case you missed that bit. What's wrong with giving my honest assessment of a person I know? Is it "trashing someone's reputation" when you're simply bringing to light aspects of someone they might prefer to keep hidden because otherwise certain segments of the population wouldn't like them

I would kill her for you. If you want.

That's why I said, "not conventionally attractive." I don't ever hear any arguments that Benedict Cumberbatch is traditionally handsome, just that some women happen to find him very attractive. There are absolutely core standards for attractivenes—not EVERYONE has to find someone like, say, Robert Redford attractive,

Alt hed: Fifty Shades of Brown—Watch Judge Kara Whip Those Offenders Into Shape!

Yeah...in some cases finding a personality match could be harder than finding an attractive match!

Completely agree! But when I think about women being extremely picky, I tend to imagine that they're holding out for a guy who stereotypically has it all—is nice, and kind, and has all his hair, has a career, etc., AND is very attractive. If you don't care about that, just about a personality match, you've actually

This guy already looks like a dad, so presumably there is a resemblance.

I'm happy for her, but I'll say it—she's marrying a man who isn't really conventionally attractive, at least not from the picture she posted. If that's not one of your criteria (I'd take a hot baldy over that guy any day) then I would imagine it's actually a lot easier.

I wrote an actual letter, not an open letter, to my ex's new girlfriend. She was a blogger and I found her site after an acrimonious exchange with my ex where he mentioned that she was a writer too. I read a number of her posts pertaining to him, including a few that specifically mentioned me, and I had an honest,

Lololololololol okay bud. Have fun fucking your guns to sleep at night. The rest of us back on Planet Earth will keep a spot warm for you.