You win.

Welcome to Jalopnik where anything with 996 headlamps = ugly.

No shit

What a strange way of illustrating that (pun intended). Seriously though. why wouldn't you post a photo? Or a sweet drawing???

From the MG review on caradvice.co.au the new MGs seem to be pretty decent cars.

...So it's a modern Yugo, then?

It's sold in the UK as well, and was therefore tested by Euro NCAP: a neither great, nor disastrous three stars.

Malcolm Forbes also owned one. I only know because my cousin sat in it.

It does, though I still think it needs a V-shaped bar underneath, something like this terrible Paint edit I made:

Uday's got blown to fuck by the U.S military. SMH

Perfect for the daily commute when the avg speed is 15mph. Got rear ended? No problem! It came with a lifetime supply of tape that magically appears in the center console!

Hey sport, I'm allowed to be hopeful when the article says "increase flexibility in the power train"

That was easy. Not a challenging question at all.....

The reviews I saw about their C300 (available as a 4-door sedan with stick through 2011) said the manual transmission was a loose, floppy affair. No fun.

So, basically a better looking Panamera at almost half the price.

It may be a clichè here on Jalopnik, but the manny tranny does it for me.