I think it has to do with FF and IE using DirectWrite and I haven't found a way to enable it in Chrome or Opera.

I tried that too, still kind of shitty.

I've done the nameless bookmark bar button thing for a long time, why waste that space on text and only get a few bookmarks in when you can put dozens up there.

"1024x768 is 4:3 = 1.33

It's not final software, but it seems much more jerky than IE10 (not)Metro mode. Unusably so actually. Desktop mode is fine, Metro mode is jerky. Odd.

The Canary build already has support for it, so I'll say 2 releases from stable support.

Half on cable TV, half on youtube. Was it just me or is Romneys new strategy deny everything and play mirror mirror?

Go on? This is more expensive than both together and makes compromises compared to either.

Can't think of a very good use case for it at this price, vs a laptop + wacom tablet, or laptop + iPad. Cool concept, late to the party and too pricey.

So if it just turns off what makes the germs bad for you rather than killing them, does this effectively circumvent the problem of creating more resistant strains through selective pressure?

Once for an OS upgrade...Can't remember another time. That's a lot of weight and space for something I use so little.

Zero, I hate them.

None of that favorites list was sexist actually.

The majority of the buzzfeed list didn't strike me as sexist actually...And for every "women are crazy" there was a "women are smarter", what do you expect with hundreds of millions of unique users googling their whims every day.

How I wish. Put that Xbox Live branding in Windows 8 to good use, Microsoft! That would make the OS more tempting.

I'm Indian and I never knew that the counterclockwise version represented Kali, that is interesting and fitting. I knew the clockwise one just meant goodness or purity before the Nazis hijacked the symbol.

Anyone of any gender from any religion faces some pressure leaving, but there are only a few cases of Sikhs being beaten for it, I think.

People saw 1 previously so they assumed it was 1, then they saw 1.3 so they wrongly assumed it's pushing past its limit of 1, which makes no sense, all it means is that the max clock was actually 1.3 the whole time.

The manufacturer must define a maximum clock rate or things may get unstable, all this is doing is ramping it up to its maximum defined clock rate during load periods while staying lower to save power during idle. All modern PCs and smartphones do this, the difference being we don't know what Apple officially clocks…

I'm confused what people think the difference is, help me out here. My old Nexus S runs at 100-200MHz at idle, then dynamically clocks up at load, I can watch the CPU frequency increase during touch input or app loading or anything else. Any modern smartphone does this. What is different about this one? Dynamic…