Still a better decision than marrying Robin Thicke.

Who wore it better?

But instead they paid some lawyers to bully her into giving it to them. That's distasteful.

They could certainly offer her a decent finder's fee.

Pretty much anything a man needs, viagra, vasectomy etc is covered by health insurance plans. Why shouldn't women have the same type of coverage? The only reason your fertility treatments aren't covered is because you are a woman. If you were a dude, they would be.

First, why should abortions be covered by health insurance (when pregnancy isn't from rape/incest or a danger to the mother's health)?

Oh, he knows some gay people so it is cool.

This is my body, This is my blood, Happy are they who come to my supper.

I just find the euphemisms annoying. I'm fat, goddammit, not a "big beautiful woman," in the same way I'm tall and not "statuesque" or whatever.

I understand (and applaud) the sentiment, but I also really wish we could get to a point where "fat" was a neutral descriptor and not an insult. It annoys me greatly that I can't use the accurate self-description without well-meaning people assuring me that I'm not *really* fat, or telling me not to be so hard on…

You guys. Can we not just appreciate the sentiment instead of wondering if she lit-rally wants to ban calling people fat?

I live in fear of a robot dominated future. Seriously, Siri freaked me out when that shit came out. Everyone was like "OMG SO FUN! She talks back to you!" And I was like "YOU GUYS SHE TALKS BACK TO YOU!!!!" No. I don't like it. I don't like it one bit.

No.

It's probably a minority of busy-bodies with an amplified voice who are protesting the tree, which is kind of classic sex-negative behavior. Act all offended about someone else's activity and then claim to speak for everyone. my assumption of course

Pretty expensive ornaments...

I always elect to err in the opposite direction. "Your baby is so cute!" is always the right way to go in my book. I'd rather accidentally embarrass someone that isn't the parent as opposed to the person who is. It's worked out okay for me so far.

It would be a rare event if he started on a 17-year old. More likely, he began to groom them at a much younger age. With the pattern of abuse established, you are dealing with a 17-year old that probably has a very different way of thinking and acting than you did at that age.

Well, he probably started earlier. Or if he had threatened to withhold something a 17 year old believed he "needed" from coach (like a recommendation letter for a college application, a reference for a possible job) I can see it happening. Teenagers aren't known for their clear thinking and great decision making.…

Wow.

Lets not lie to ourselves