timouk
Timouk
timouk

Keep in mind, Kelly is a gender neutral name.

Now playing

False. On a world rally car even losing (or damaging) the small hanging “weather strip” portion of the front bumper can significantly alter the front lift of the car and the the overall handling. Less crucial with R5/S2000 cars, but certainly damaging or losing the rear wing is a big deal. I can remember several

mmmmm

Are there 10 foot drops in Florida?

Fuck all y’all, my next truck’s gonna have one of these bad boys.

Normally I agree that both people share some fault, and yes the situation could have been “avoided” if the camera car simply let him in... so I guess I do agree, but considering how many things the i8 driver was doing wrong, I’d have been tempted to do the same thing (except actually let him hit me.) The i8 driver did

I was going to say no you got to let people in but then I watched it and you’re totally right. No signal no entry. That was a bad merge plus the line went solid so technically you can’t merge into that lane there.

At no point was the dashcam driver supposed to let that a-hole in. Just because someone wants to merge, does not mean you have to alter your driving. BMW needed to slow down an merge after the car goes by or wait.

Looks like a Ford. I don’t follow what happened though. You say the SUV stopped? Because a cop with lights going was behind him? Seems like that would be something an officer should reasonably expect, but then the writer says that he, “...ran the cruiser off the road...”

Getting on jalopnik.com.

...and this is how fast a 2011 Yaris goes at Bonneville... with a tailwind:

shouldn’t take much for a well-seasoned auto enthusiast.

I saw the post and I was like, “IS DOUG BACK?!”

Ha ha, I wouldn’t say expert, but thanks. Always happy to chat to someone about what is honestly a really complicated issue!

In structural engineering:

Commitment from countries that have said they’ll help. Frankly whether people in the US like the idea or not there should be more effort from us to resettle refugees because we’re a massive participant in the destabilization of the region. None of our promises have been kept unless that promise was killing someone.

Sta

They’re not, by any definition of the word, refugees. They are safe. They’ve traveled through multiple safe European countries to get to Calais. They are economic migrants.

It was never policy. It’s a slogan. Hundreds of thousands of immigrants were sent back to Europe in the 1800s because they were deemed criminals, too poor, too sick and otherwise unable to assimilate. That was the whole point of Ellis Island: turn around those the U.S. didn’t want. It’s too bad we don’t have the moral

I will never defend such behavior, but one should never expect no side effects of USA & UK f*cking up the Middle East

Because we don’t want to deal with the mess we encourage by supporting Middle East conflict?