It was neither funny nor goofy.

What an obnoxiously written article. If you can’t write from an unbiased perspective, you shouldn’t be posting it as “news” - this is more of an editorial. 

What on earth is the point of this “news story”? Perhaps they just legitimately like the content that NatGeo is posting. And to show this, they are commenting and liking posts...y’know, like EVERYONE else does...

But...it wasn’t a question. He made a statement.

Am I the only one who was wanted some context or explanation about why the choices were put on this list? As it is, it’s just a random list of some movies and TV shows.

I’m exactly the same. I pushed my way through season one, and part of season two before ultimately deciding it just wasn’t a show for me. Still some funny moments, but I couldn’t understand the acclaim it’s been getting. Maybe my sense of humour just didn’t click with what the show was delivering.

Out of interest, what qualifies a comment to be upgraded to non-Pending status? I’ve noticed an increasing number of pending comments on the JPGs posts lately, with only the occasional non-critical, non-political comment approved. It would be good to know the guidelines for what makes an appropriate comment.

But Tokyo Tower’s lights go out at midnight...

Beautiful shot. Reminds me of the tombs in Gyeongju!

Nothing to with gaming, but at least it's bright and colourful.

I was thinking the same thing...

Sorry, but how is this a “new” Apple patent? The article even opens by mentioning that it was filed in 2011.

I’d love to know this as well. I’ve got photos from all across the globe which I think would fit what “gamers might find interesting”, but am reluctant to submit as I don’t know if they’d get through (...unless I submitted some of my Japan photos...).