1) you don’t know that everyone wasn’t using PEDs similar to everyone using greenies. Ken Griffey and Frank Thomas very well could have been using something and we just don’t know.
ThunderUP
thunderup
You’re out of your mind if you think I’m gonna read that.
Any take on this subject that is not “pierce is petty as hell and should stop being an asshole” is objectively wrong.
GW truly is something, legendary. Thirty years from now when my grandkids hear the names Curry, Thompson, Green, their eyes will go wide and they’ll say they were the greatest ever. They’ll also say Durant was a bitch.
“The word basketball wasn’t invented until 1891, so why do I have millions of dollars?”
I think it’s posted in full on reddit still
Speaking of the sexually inappropriate behavior and the shitty men list, are we ever going to mention the fact that former deadspin star Greg Howard was on there (in red) as was former Deadspin editor AJ Daulerio (also red), Tommy Craggs, and Sam Biddle (also, I believe, red)? Or are we just going to ignore that…
Get over it! Few intelligent people actually do like Wonder Woman.
I found ‘Ant-Man’ to be more enjoyable, with a more interesting plot and a far better final sequence, than ‘Wonder Woman’...and I think we can all agree that ‘Ant-Man’ is a “average” Marvel movie...so when I see ‘Wonder Woman’ listed as one of the best comic book movies ever, I have to scratch my head.
This is the 5th LaVar Ball story on Deadspin today.
Steve Kerr and Greg Popovich are unrivaled in the most nuanced, articulate takes in the NBA coaching sphere.
she didn’t have to bargain though. she could walk away and do literally anything else.
Nude scenes in art films are comparable to Bumfights.com? C’mon....
This is the most ridiculous argument. She signed up to do work for him, and the work involved nudity. Was the nudity in the contract? Did she disagree with the nudity? Is there a problem with nudity in film? This wasn’t like some personal photography, she signed up to work on a film project and the film included…
This line of reasoning is nuts. This is a grown woman, completely infantilizing herself and asking you to buy the idea that she has no agency or free will in the presence of someone so powerful. Like, his powerful aura hypnotized her into signing up to do a job for money.
Yeah, but that’s not sexual misconduct, which is what this article called it.
You really have some problems.
To an extent, but is exploitation just any job you didn’t want to do for less money than you’d like? Because if so most jobs count. In an article about potential sexual assault, “his contracts don’t pay very well” seems like a weirdly petty thing to include.
If he did do some of those things he’s clearly horrible, but “my wages to do a nude scene weren’t as high as I would like” is a really lukewarm inclusion in this.