On a personal level, the modern waxed chest trend kind of weirds me out and I am perfectly fine with my men being hairy. But on a societal level, GOOD, FUCK YOU ALL, I SHOULDN’T HAVE TO SHAVE MY FUCKING LEGS TO BE CONSIDERED ATTRACTIVE, YOU CAN ALL SUFFER ANNOYING HAIR REMOVAL FOR DUBIOUS AESTHETIC REASONS TOO.

Well a swamp provides ecological benefits and has a reason to exist.

You’ll be sorry you mocked him when the apocalypse comes, and you find yourself in desperate need of yards of paracord.

I think they’re showing how it all falls apart without women??

Tell me about your wife. I know you have one, she gets a passing mention sometimes, but I’d like to know more. What do you admire about her, what have you learned from her. You seem like a caring husband and a good dad (so far) and somehow (??!?) I trust from your tone in the FunBag posts that you could write that…

I don’t get why you boys feel the need to post jokes and shallow vapid pieces all day. How hard is it to do a couple of gossipy-fun posts (you know celebs, sports what the fuck ever that is silly and fun), a couple of updates on what the administration is doing, and updates on the Women’s Strike Day? Why are you all…

Remember on election day when all those idiot men at Deadspin said they weren’t voting or were voting third party or various other dumb shit?

This post gets a stamp of approval from me, an apparently humorless feminist who was pissed at this morning’s posts.

Yeah, no matter how they try to sell it, what they did in removing the articles was pretty craven.

I like how Jake left out his promotion from the post on Gothamist.

Nooooo....I love the DCist!! I don’t want it with a side of right-wing propaganda!

“Just as Bloomberg doesn’t cover Bloomberg, we don’t plan to cover Joe Ricketts and so we decided to take down our coverage of him. No one asked us to do it,” Gothamist co-founder Jake Dobkin told Jezebel. “It was a decision made solely by Jen [Chung] and me.”

If ever there was a family that deserves to be named for a disease...

Here’s the thing: Trump’s tweets aren’t a smokescreen. In fact, they are often the easiest way to know what he’s thinking. The only reason I’d dismiss *this* specific series of tweets is you can tell they were written by somebody else. Because Trump’s tone and manner of speaking is so goddamn obvious that even the…

Ugh fucking PAREENE. With friends like these...

Norm MacDonald had a shtick on Weekend Update where he’d tell a lame joke, and it wouldn’t get any laughs, so he’d awkwardly pause as if the laughs were going to come eventually. Then he’d move on, then five minutes later he’d try the joke AGAIN, tell it even more poorly and wait even longer for the laughs. His sheer…

“Luncheon” sounds like I would still be hungry at the end.

I think I’m done with Jez today. See y’all tomorrow.

Getting rid of EPA, getting rid of Department of Education, tweet something that the media will latch onto and no one will notice, it’s the best possible idea in our kept up kardashian world. he can set in motion whatever he wants and mitigate the backlash by doing something dumb.

Can we maybe stop talking about his tweets? There are things that the Republicans are doing everyday that threaten the American way of life. The president’s asinine tweets are the perfect cover as they are both sensational and largely inconsequential. Let’s give it a rest. Please? Our way of life, based on some of our…