I’m okay with using nukes all the time, every time, as long as we develop working Radaway medicine and laser pistols. Oh, and I’ll need an indestructible dog companion. Get me all those and you can fire all the nukes you like.

Damn, TBone. That’s bleak.

lol sure

Typical millennial. All meme meme meme.

A multi-game suspension isn’t enough for Burfict. A better punishment would be to trade him to the Cleveland Browns.

Blair Walsh Lived A Kicker’s Nightmare

So because you believe there are crooks on both sides you’re siding with the far smaller ‘it’s not man-made’ side for what reasons exactly?

I actually love it when conservatives try to claim climate change acceptance is “blind” and yet they’re all too happy to listen to the largest industry on planet Earth (and the politicians in their pockets) tell them it’s a-okay to keep buying and burning their product in their cars and factories because, trust us,…

Right, you’re confusing the units. When they say “2 degree change” it’s an average increase of 2 degrees C. Not F. I won’t pile on, but you really should actually read about what climate change is.

I read both articles. Reading your first link strengthens my argument “Exxon NEVER denied the potential for humans to impact the climate system. It did question – legitimately, in my opinion – the validity of some of the science.”

“The earth cant survive an average increase of 2 degree change over the next 20 years, but there are nightly 40 degree changes”

Our president said ACC global warming is a bigger threat to us than terrorism.

Yes it will be. Current warming will result in trapped methane (and already is resulting in this in Russia) being released from thawed permafrost and from ocean floors.

Yes. I never understand why it’s a mortal sin for some people to at least admit that presence of mankind has an effect on the environment? Why are some people clinging to the notion that we can do no harm? That the Earth is too big to fail because of us?

Methane is actually a far more efficient greenhouse gas than CO2, and the methane contribution by the cattle industry has as much importance as carbon emissions.

this person is the dumbest person I have ever encountered on the internet. Good luck!

Thanks to satellites that can measure the ground temperature of every square kilometer of earth continuously, the last 25 years of temperature data has been incredibly reliable.

I explain to those people that what has climatologists worried is not that it is changing, but rather the rate of the change. The rate of change is surpassing any historical natural change and that is the evidence that we are the difference. A plane can safely descend from an altitude of 10,000 feet down to 10 feet,…

That is a straw man argument. When people write about, “deny[ing] climate change,” they are referring to denying the following scientific facts:

I don’t see why that would be hard to believe conceptually. Think about it like this: humanity, in about 150 years, has burned the equivalent of islands of organic material and put it in the atmosphere.