At the risk of the ire of Jalopnik, what are the “personal rights” you are referring to?

I did. I didn’t “call you out” in reply to this. You posted 2 in a row. You continued on my reply to the first thread.

Where does it say “pulling out in front of someone”? Anywhere?

Can this be clarified:

Nope. 5 minutes on FB is 5 minutes wasted.

I’m still not even clear on how you expect all this to work...

- No it doesn’t say that, anywhere on the page. If you could please “quote” as I do, that’d be swell.

Thanks for the link. Did you read it? Or any of my previous posts.

Nope:

Nope. Don't really care that much to go to her FB. And then try to figure out.

Ahhhh... I new thing that I’m supposedly not doing! “Lookinging the the rearview”. Great. I hadn’t gotten that obe yet. I’ll add that to the list of things I wasn’t talking about.

I’m not sure it will.

Thanks for a redundant definition and bring up a situation i wasn’t talking about.

Show me a law saying I must:

Nothing. I. Have. Said. Talks. About. “Actively”. Slowing. Someone. Down.

Ya, if they run up on me at dangerous speeds expecting me to make a dangerous manuever to “get the F over”, then yes, asshole. They can fucking wait for me to complete my pass. It’s a pretty simple thing...

That’s not what they said. Many seem to want to put their own spin on it. Unfortunately, I can only go by what they said “[in every situation with me quickly approching] move the F over”

Do you really read and understand? Noone’s “holding the lane” or “playing police officer”. Or “intervening”. Show me where I suggested that.

If they were courteous and wait at a safe distance, per traffic rules, then I wouldn’t need to be.

I’m not quite sure why, but you’ve turned this into a VERY specific and rare situation... which isn’t positted in my post, or the post in the other thread. You’re the only one who is talking about “jumping out”.