thhg
The Holy Hand Grenade
thhg

How about the reviewer saying that Jason Voorhees had no known motive? Jason killed anyone at Crystal Lake because he saw his mother get decapitated. He did not kill before that. And the sequel, IIRC, literally begins with a shot of an altar devoted to his mother’s decapitated head. So it’s not exactly subtle. He’s

Ever since the Kinjaing, with the exception of Iggy and Dowd, the reviewers here haven’t exactly been known for paying attention to detail. Hawke could have turned to the camera and explained his character’s motivation directly to the audience and there’s still a good chance that the reviewer would have been too busy w

I had a very different reaction to this, found it a cracker-jack little horror that wasn’t super scary, but very creepy and thought it connected everything really well.

Does your doctor know you have access to the internet? – somewhat bemused, Arbroath, United Kingdom, 18 hours ago

What the fuck is this comment? Are you ok?

I think it’s pretty funny that the whole world really thinks that Amber cut of Johnny’s finger. First he got hit with a magic glass bottle. It could cut off his finger but didn’t cut or scrape the rest of his hand. Then after that something in the bottle made him write angry messages on the walls to in a very artist

I will give you points for phrasing your statement in vague enough wording for it to be taken however one chooses. 

He has a pretty good agent.

These rulings strip women of their humanity and burden men with the job of treating women like owned objects - like slaves they are expected to control. The is Christian Sharia Law in the US, and this is what Patriarchy is.

We have learned over and over again that body language means nothing. Body language relies on bias and prejudice. The crying, staring etc that the juror objected to can equally be read as a woman desperately trying to get the jury to believe her abuse. Depp’s manner can also be read as non-chalance to cover up guilt.

The ‘mutual abuse’ issue really got out of hand back in the 80s when the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) was in fashion and ‘zero-tolerance’ policies were becoming widespread. Finally, idiots were able to shriek “look, women perpetrate just as much domestic violence as men!” That was one of the main problems with the CTS

You are not missing anything. They are idiots.

“Ultimately what I think is truthful was that they were both abusive to each other.”

Yah the criticisms of her are such dogwhistles. She didn't smile enough, or she smiled the wrong way. Her crying wasn't good enough. Like wtf...

No victim will ever be perfect enough for them, if that victim has a vagina and/or presents as a woman.

And because she was upset and he wasn’t, he’s more believeable. This is such bullshit. Maybe she was upset because what she was saying was true and painful to recall, and he wasn’t because he was repeating a lie he cooked up and couldn’t get all that emotional about it.

A microcosm of the shitty times we live in. All trans people want, all LGBTQ+ people want, is to be allowed to exist, as they are, in peace. That’s it, a simple fucking request for the smallest amount of human consideration, to just not attack people who are causing others no harm. It’s easy too! It takes far more

“Art is fire plus algebra.” That’s a quote credited to Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges. Basically the idea is that in really great art—and, by extension, storytelling—there is an almost mathematical precision to decision-making. Yes, much of artistic expression is about feeling and emotion. But plugging that into a

I think the main takeaway is that people have no idea how complex abuse is, I don’t know how you can look at the timeline of events and your takeaway is that Amber Heard is somehow hurting the cause. She is part of the cause and being a victim of abuse is messy. The doubt the public put in Heard that somehow the real

his failure to follow “competition production protocols”—whatever that means!