Non sequitur.

Ad hominem. The last refuge of the outwitted. Check and mate.

“Wow, he really dodged a bullet there!”

Reductio ad absurdum. Your argument ignores the self-evident nature through which one cannot exist without giving rise to the other. You have, in fact, proven the point you wished to negate.

Your own response indicates your inability to provide a sufficient argument. Check and mate.

Indeed. I’ve often called this phenomenon the dreaded “Purchaser’s Mistake”.

My riposte: Is it not the desire of the capatalist to henceforth bring about the conditions that would prove beneficial to the consumerist?

Ah. A classic argumentum ad ignorantiam.

I’ve often dared to posit that there is, in fact, no difference at all.

Ah, you poor fools. Ensnared in thine web of capatalism once again. *scoffs*

I honestly think he’s too old to actually play for an MLB team. Seems more like a fun one-time thing.

this is what happens when you stop bullying “nerds” and let them feel comfortable expressing themselves in public

I don’t just say this for any animal, but that’s a big boy

It’s crazy to think that if the Warriors had lost, I never would have heard of this guy

Just kidding, is that guy good? I don’t watch hockey

Ryan Bust.

yeah where’s the story BROTHER

I wanna hang out backstage and light batteries on fire with Ludacris

Hey all! I don’t mean to be controversial and I certainly don’t want to ruffle any feathers here, but I can’t help but point out that Barry Bonds being the “greatest baseball player of all time” is very much in dispute, due to his history of using performance-enhancing drugs while in the league, which some people feel…

YO THIS IS THE BEST FUCKIN JOKE IN DEADSPIN HISTORY