She was “overly aggressive” and now it’s “harrassment”? She’s being rude. She’s not threatening to rape or dox you or anything near harrassment.

Um, no. Men of all colors outearn women of all colors, especially in tech.

What’s stupid is telling women, who’ve been subjugated by men for centuries, how to feel when once, one time, the shoe *might* be on the other foot. If you can’t understand why women might laugh about this then your understanding of human nature needs some work. There’s even a work for it in German.

Oh please. Context is everything and you stepped in it.

Women and minorities have to be twice as awesome to be perceived as equal with men in a biased environment. It makes complete sense once hiring is done by women or non-gender biased individuals that those twice as awesome women and minorities will be promoted more. And maybe even take over leadership.

So promotions should continue the bias of the hiring before it? No. If you promote equally in a previously biased environment, it would make sense that the few women badass enough to get into the field against odds would be promoted more.

Or maybe if you had been on our side like ever, you’d get some of that empathy IF it happens to you. You can’t benefit from your privilege your whole life and then IF, one time, discrimination happens to you, expect people who have been smacked around their whole lives to bandage your singular boo boo. Equal sympathy…

Yes, because our goal in life is to be thought of as “nice”. What a spectacularly dumb comment to make on a women’s website, to a woman, on a story about equality.

Responsible for 280 people? The hurricane?

Maybe if we could stop obsessively judging moms and talking so much shit we’d have less of the “weird” moms everyone is here to complain about?

Maybe. Or maybe it will produce assumptions about a person based on our limited and biased understanding of nationality, gender, and race.

It’s literally every day that the police extrajudicially execute someone. When the rule of the law is that they’re not allowed to do it, saying that they only do it sometimes is not a defense. I could only murder people once a year, and that’s 364 days I’m not killing anyone. I mean, I encounter dozens of people a…

Why is it that you don’t have to spell out how not to break the law in any other contract? Like when I hire someone to work on my house, I don’t have to specify that they should not murder people in my house, or rape people in my house while they are there. When I rent my spare room out, I don’t have to specify that…

That’s not even remotely what happened. And that’s not what’s happening.

You want an answer to “how should you do something you’re not supposed to be doing?”. And that’s a stupid question which is why it’s not being taken seriously.

Hey, do you want tea?

It is if it’s unwanted.

That’s not what’s happening. They are not just punishing anyone who is accused. They are separating people and on rare occasions, kicking people out who they have found violated their code of conduct.

So we’re saying a university has to spell out all the ways a person could become subject to discipline? They need to spell out consent and how not to rape, specifically?

No. I absolutely do not believe that women will falsely claim rape for political gain. That you think they will says more about you than us.