you don't? hover over this reply. top-right. it only works for replies to yourself. go ahead, delete-me! it's super fun.

i think that's just how he looks. they pretty him up a lot for the bond role. which i still don't think they achieved, in terms of suave/refined vibe. excellent actor, of course. but not photoshop-smooth.

"if she doesn't consent, or can't consent, it's rape."

laurie is about as interesting as a damp towel. amy deserves him. they deserve each other.

no one cares about LAURIE. Amy stole EUROPE from Jo. YOU DO NOT DESERVE THAT TRIP, YOU BITCH.

THIS bitch.

if anyone would like to practice, i am happy to reply to them so they can dismiss me! that's just how good it feels, i'm willing to share the joy.

Please, this. Please. To everyone else, if a troll replies to you, you can dismiss the comment by hovering over the top-right-hand corner of the reply, and a down arrow will appear. Click it and then click "X Dismiss."

...no. she's just a gold digger. he's a olde-timey unapologetic racist.

eh. 1/2 is stretching it. his grossness affects other people. she has only herself to shame. and if anyone is a gross-o for dating outside a marriage, it's the person in the marriage.

out of how many? and where is he?

"I know you want rapists to burn, I get it." <—straw man. she never said anything like that. you attribute a falsified opinion and ascribe it to her. you built a straw man in order to tear it down.

i don't want to think everyone who dubs themselves Sir-Defends-A-Bro is a horrible person, and it's so pervasive, so common and uniform, that i just have to think they say it because it's easy. it's obvious. they think it needs saying.*

well, neither of those was my intention.

i've thought about it a lot. and rape is such a horrible crime, that many people prefer not to contemplate it. but defamation, everyone can relate to. the idea of being raped, of reaching in and accessing empathy for that, is very difficult. the idea of being lied about, is something everyone can already relate to.

so you ARE only focused on one side. that's all i said. i don't care what you have to say about the victim in this case. i've noted accurately that you are speaking only in defense of the colloquial-rapist. that is an accurate observation. so why u mad?

well again, too bad. i will not stop. you are not the boss. you don't police what i say.

bleah. honestly, every single time this is discussed, some stranger rushes to the male's defense. the "poor boy life ruined" narrative is such an automatic knee-jerk that i almost can't stand it. those same individuals NEVER rally for survivors' rights.

she is NOT venting. she is NOT creating a toxic environment. and i sincerely doubt she cares if you take her seriously. stop your insane tone-policing, please. if you wish to achieve an honest, calm, factual discussion, you can't go around accusing everyone who disagrees with you of straw manning and ad hominem and…

so, you are only focused on the one side, because your position regards language associated with only one party? if you are not focused on only one side, i apologize for missing your posts which address the suffering of the other side equally. it seems to me, that you are doing a thing which you admit you are doing?…