i do not entirely follow your train of thought here and you seem from where i am to be veering dangerously close to victim-blaming, so i will limit my commentary to saying that advocating abstinence for homosexuals is inherently judgmental and is not at all accepting. "if a Christian woman truly believes that it's not…

uhm, it was not a woman brainwashing these young men. in what universe is the responsibility for this one "Christian Ladies"?

but it was a "position of power" situation. so...

"show me your papers."

^it's. freedom of speech does not equal freedom from consequences. if neo-nazi cowards were risking their employers finding out what they've said, i bet they would say a lot less. not censoring anyone - just holding them accountable.

you understand neither how freedom of speech nor slippery slopes work.

i'm all for stripping neo-nazi and KKK forums of their anonymity too. can we do that? please?

not hat. i meant bean. beans, hats, trees, being trapped in a box in wonderland. being trapped in a room in wonderland, someone having your heart in a box. being asleep, being in a glass coffin, your own sorcery, the/a dark one turning you into an infant... they have established plenty of opportunities for people to…

but bae could've gone through the hat and arrived in our world in 1984, and be 40 now, or he could've arrived in our world in 1996 and be 28.

would you feel the same way about any males in any costumes if they were leered at and verbally solicited repeatedly by an aggressive gay man? that that's the cost of dressing up as batman, to deal with those kinds of sexual comments? at what point would unwanted comments be "too far" if it was a male who was the…

gah, stupid commenting system. wrong reply!

and your meaningless nitpicking diminishes her action. it was a small victory. so Fing what? people are not being hyperbolic about it, you're just trying to tear it down anyway.

how is standing up for oneself in front of a crowd of verbal harassers not courageous to you? it's not walk-into-enemy-fire courage, but it's a lot braver than putting up with it rather than make a fuss. she made a fuss. that took courage.

vigilantism? did someone shoot these guys? execute or detain them? punch or slap them?

Donna is so not defined by her weight, not on Parks & Rec. No. Way. She is defined by her savvy: business, romantic and otherwise.

People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint...

maybe the real issue is that the producers of these games/movies/content think of their consumer base as only male and/or that only the male consumers need to be enticed with eye candy? maybe if the fanbois stopped zombie-walking over to every hot chick at every booth they could actually have the kind of convention…

"i don't see any of the creative accomplishments" - then you have only your own ignorance to answer for. she doesn't need to justify herself to ignorant jerks like you, her accomplishments are 2 clicks away, and anyone who isn't aware of her myriad contributions really has no business questioning anyone else's geekdom.

oldsporkgirl didn't come warn me about the last season of L O S T, ergo time travel will not exist in my lifetime.