Lies cut deep too. But you don’t consider men to be human and your ideology is built on shoddy studies that don’t survive peer review. 

I feel like this is another excuse of a tweet, something to pretend men aren’t people and that women don’t have WAYYY more buttons to press.

What dominance, exactly? What man gets the better end of a divorce (and before you say it, the only reason women are poorer after a divorce is because they cannot have access to literally all of the mans money). What man actually has his feelings and his ideas validated? Women just say “lol men” and get showered with…

The idea that white men (let’s face it - that’s who’s getting worked up here)

I think the problem is that grown men breaking up fights is not a new thing. Men grooming their children and taking care of the house isn’t revolutionary, its standard practice.

EMMA! WE MISS YOU! PLZ COME BAK!!!!!

I hope Don Lemon isn’t the new Wendy. Wendy has said and done some pretty shitty things in the past that have flown under the radar. Don hasn’t been all bad.

Ummm his faith is HIS faith and why the fuck do you think you get to dictate to him what that is? He may not follow everything in the Bible, but that is actually kinda good (because there is a lot of shit in the Bible that isn’t that good).

Does anyone else feel a bit icky talking about these three, the divorce, and whatever it is that get any of them going?

We can’t talk about Sharice Davids. She isn’t from the great coastal metropolis of NYC, she is a flyover state person remember?

“All or nothing or fuck it” is literally how Roger Stone does politics, and Roger Stone has been THE Republican electioneer since Bush Jr took office. If he doesn’t get what he wants he will burn it all down to get it. It has made all of our politics worse.

I actually was that person in my department when I started, and it caused a lot of needless friction that set my ideas *back*.

Came here to say this. I don’t agree with it, but I’ve read it on conservative blogs.

The point Renard was making was that Beto was obscure and that he wasn’t relevant prior to 2018, and now AOC is and also she is actually governing. But that wasn’t true. AOC wasn’t a national media obsession before 2018 either, but Beto was governing before AOC was. The idea that Beto was a nobody only exists in the…

No, Renard said Beto rose from obscurity while AOC was actually going and governing.

There are 535 members of Congress.

The problem with these takes is that in a world without the problems of today, this same show would air. I mean, if misogyny and racism and economic inequality were not such gold mines for TV show plots, what would we air on TV? Stupid shows that are easy to laugh at and have fun with.

Because they can’t afford Pittsburgh anymore. When the economist says “most liveable city,” what they really mean is the city is “expensive enough to drive out poor people, not expensive enough that someone with their Masters Degree couldn’t afford to live here.” And then parks and walking and stuff.

They didn’t “make” it, they ordered it off a screen printer. 

It’s a perspective that needs considered more, if people want to understand people in power. I mean when R Kelly did go to trial, no one actually accused him of rape (though sex with an underage person is rape in that jurisdiction). White people didn’t want to put a successful black man and, I stress, at the time a…