Think it through. Seriously. Name me the father who is proud of his child being a stripper and I'll shut up. This is not a shocking thing. Most parents do not want their child involved in the sex entertainment industry. The ones who do are major outliers.

So we can expect to see all the nerdling bigots come out in force? Wondering what "quota" had to be filled and why "they" want to be in everything?

You thought that NSA thing was an accident? Or the fault of Obama?

I remember when it was a thing on comment forums to see "Snape killed Dumbledore", in all caps, a propos of absolutely nothing, after that particular Harry Potter volume came out. I was spoiled but I laughed out loud. Because it was so trollish that it was, for me, hilarious.

Yeah, that was unnecessary to print. I understand why he did. It's explosive stuff. ESPECIALLY for that time. But, at some point, I have to wonder, are journalists seeking facts about the subject or just willing to print anything about the subject in the name of getting "inside" his/her head? Because in that…

That's an unenforceable rule, anyway. I wouldn't dream of making it. (if I actually had kids, LOL!) That said, keep your private life private, i.e. no fucking while I'm in the house. There are some things I NEVER want to hear or even think about.

If you're a stripper, nothing. If you're the father of a stripper, everything.

No. I'd make the rules until she's 18, legal, and living outside of my house. I can't control what she does in private, and wouldn't want to, but I'd hope she's respecting herself and doing what makes her happy and not just to please some young buck who just sees her as a hole.

The Purity Ring of Poetry.

"But it'll keep until there's a passable Forever21 knockoff."

Exactly. I don't want to be on social media but it has its uses. And Facebook has a ubiquity in the non-tech world that is undeniable.

Is it wrong that I was hoping she'd give the finger?

Oooooh...baby, baby, that was WRONG!

You can post that link until the cows come home. It doesn't change the fact that Kim Kardashian is a total outlier in the sex tape business. Plenty of white reality starlet's sex tapes have gotten out over the years. And none of them, except Kardashian, has moved past it into other non-sex-related profitable…

Ray J ain't doing shit. They have no "thing" to do. Ray J is constantly made fun of as "the sex tape guy" whenever he tried to do anything to up his fame or get work. He may not be called "whore" or "slut", and that certainly is a point worth making, I agree. But he's not profiting from it, he's become a joke.

No. What she wanted to show Dadddy how angry she was at him. It's a legitimate choice, yes. But let's be clear: She could have done literally anything instead. She didn't need to do porn and she's not a sex-positive feminist, proud of her sexuality and unwilling to be defined or constrained by social mores. Read…

I'm sorry, I don't agree with any of this.

Considering he was the final arbiter of what went on that cover, I'd say it came to his particular taste. I understand the concept of what you're talking about. I agree it exists.

Consistency is the hobgoblin of tiny minds.

Oooh, shock me, shock me, with your contrarian trolling!