It would generally be violation of State and Federal laws to fire someone who is legally allowed to work in the US due to their immigration status.
It would generally be violation of State and Federal laws to fire someone who is legally allowed to work in the US due to their immigration status.
You did not even bother to read the article and understand the situation. These are people who are mostly children or young adults. For many, the United States is the only country they have ever known. Most of them had little to no choice in growing up in America. They have followed the instructions and guidance that…
Maybe you should perform a thought experiment. What if you found out tomorrow that you were not a US citizen and that you were actually from Armenia? What do you think the appropriate response of the government would be to your illegal status? To immediately ship you back to Armenia, a country where you probably…
The United States condemns this provocative act. Once again North Korea has defied the will of the international community, and the international community will respond.
Do not forget his arteries are clogged with KFC.
What you are doing is called a circumstantial ad hominem. It is a logical fallacy whereby you claim that someone’s claim is invalid simply because it is in their interest to claim it. In this case, it is political interest.
It looks good in the window, but Hong Kong style duck is very fatty, like half fat.
Care to show me those “statistics”? It sounds like you are pulling them out of your tuches.
But they are also not doing anything directly associated with their employer. If you can fire someone for marching in an alt-right rally, you can fire them for marching in a gay parade (in States without protection for sexual orientation) or a Bernie/Hillary rally too.
On the plus side, the KKK mostly gave up terrorism after the federal government passed Civil Rights legislation and started holding them accountable. There are still Southerners alive today that remember when the KKK was pretty much American ISIS.
Look, being a police officer is a dangerous job, but not nearly as dangerous as you are making it out to be. The vast majority of cases police deal with are petty criminals. Usually the worst case is maybe some civilian with a gun or a knife.
It should be noted that a lot of the reason that police officers do have a high fatality rate is because most police officers these days are vehicle-mounted. Driving is one of the most dangerous daily activities most Americans do. In a typical year, it is not uncommon for more police officers to die in motor vehicle…
At a stretch, the police might be able to make good use of wheeled APCs for raids against heavily armed criminals, like terrorists or bank robbers. But there is no justifiable reason for the police to have tracked APCs or tanks, guns designed for destroying tanks and other heavy military equipment (like .50 caliber…
I think people have the right to lawfully express their disdain at repugnant ideas. I think our society has evolved to the point where overt white supremacy is publicly rejected by pretty much everybody.
I am not really sold on that idea. You do not have to have a hosting provider. White Supremacists can buy a server and host a site in their basement if they want. I don’t think hosting providers should necessarily be considered common carriers.
On the other hand, if you can fire someone for being a white supremacist, you can fire them for being a Democrat or Republican, or for being pro-choice or pro-life. Some States, like California, protect political beliefs and legal activities outside of work. I think that is a good thing.
I disagree. The government should not have the power to ban unpopular speech. Per the Bill of Rights, hate speech is protected, as it should be. It is always dangerous to give the government the ability to decide what speech is acceptable. 50 years ago, the “hatred” spewed toward “normal” society by homosexuals…
The interesting thing about the alt-right is that individually each component is very fringe: men’s rights, neo-Confederates, the KKK, neo-Nazis, Islamophonbes, some members of the far right, et cetera. . . .
A small town like Charlottesville would not have the resources to respond on their own. They called in a lot of State police and even the National Guard. The whole response was just poorly planned. The same thing happened in Berkeley.
In his case, he was not a Nazi. He was one of the other lovely alt-right people. They have a big tent: Nazis, neo-Confederates, the KKK, birthers, other assorted white-supremacists, Islamophobes, misogynists, members of the far-right . . . . It is like a Bizarro Land diversity video.