If he felt she was too close to the other protesters, all he had to do is step in front of her and guide her away a bit. He did NOT need to lay hands on her. Thats just brutality hiding under a badge.
If he felt she was too close to the other protesters, all he had to do is step in front of her and guide her away a bit. He did NOT need to lay hands on her. Thats just brutality hiding under a badge.
I believe multiple eyewitnesses said she did not touch thee other guy and merely stepped forward
If you're being attacked would you be terribly happy if the police officer stood five feet from your attacker and said "Sir, can you please stop beating LordRae to death and step over here please? Sir? Sir are you listening to me?".
It's very hard to see in the video, but at 3:03-3:05 you can see the police officer pulling her away from the man with the microphone.
I get the feeling that it's a general rule that if you begin resisting a police officer they won't sit and take it. I believe that, in crowd situations, police officers make absolutely sure they don't brawl with people and look like an easy target. She began reaching for his face and had already attacked the speaker -…
They want the doctor to hand it to you and say "THIS CHILD'S SEX IS <MALE|FEMALE|OTHER> BUT THE GENDER IS YET TO BE DETERMINED. CONGRATULATIONS HUMAN"
lol
So let me see if I understand this. You've said shit you now say you didn't
Are we now trying to change the subject?
Some people are stupid. Some people are ignorant. Some people are just assholes. You're all three. Congrats.
Already replied to that here
And I've never claimed any medical background. As always, given that you seem to literally invert anything I say, the only thing I have ever asserted is the complete opposite.
Again, you said a shit ton of other bullshit, and here you are trying to pretend you didn't.
What I don't understand is why women's bathrooms?
I personally believe they should have labelled the child as neither male or female, and simply left their gender identity fluid until the child was older.
I personally believe they should have labelled the child as neither male or female, and simply left their gender identity fluid until the child was older.
"I don't suggest you read the actual piece"
If you're not going to own up to the crappy things you've said
Every single point you just made, every *single* point is a straw-men that I never said that I have meticulously, with quotes, addressed in my previous post.
You say that the parent's labeled the child. You claim that this labeling is harmful. You're the lying weasel.