The quote at the bottom of The Guardian’s article this morning really gives away the game:

You’re making the mistake of assuming everyday people can exert any control over the currency they utilize in place of bartering for goods and services.

The problem is that they’re finding out that they don’t actually want an echo chamber. What they want is a platform to drag the libs on and get a reaction. That’s all they really care about at the end of the day.

Do you really want to have a 51% attack argument with me?

Yea, throwing shit off overpasses can be extremely dangerous and should never be applauded, even if the other side is a bunch of assholes.

There are a couple of potential use cases for blockchain. Rare earth mining, where the supply chain consists of multiple organizations and not a single one of them is to be trusted, is a decent example.

Containers alone are the best reason to recommend Firefox. It’s nice being able to keep various bits of social media confined to their own little spaces.

Okay, so why the blockchain?

The Ethereum split, as well as other block forks, are some of the most dystopian parts in this whole cryptoscheme.

Oh boy another car that will sit undriven in a warehouse somewhere and likely appreciate in values less than a stock market fund. All the while being potentially more volatile!

I’ve never had much luck with them either. Plus, if you use them somewhere you have stones, the stones get a little explody.

5th, I’ll say again what I said last time about LIFO.

Alternative Suggestion: Dan Gilroy - F&F with some Nightcrawler flair would be an interesting change.

Nah, because don’t you know? Small trucks don’t sell in the US.

It’s fun to watch them fail. The users of these platforms think they want an echo chamber, but what they really want is a forum to drag the libs and get a reaction. That’s the problem when your entire political ideology is based on othering another group of people.

Re: #5

A rechargeable headlight with a “floodlight” feature is my go-to tool for working on cars or nearly anything else. It’s amazing how often you’ll obstruct the narrow beam of light so diffusing it makes a huge difference.

So the real question is if this is an evolution of the Wankle design or something more akin to the newer Rotary-X designs.

I’m not saying single use plastics arent a problem but, no matter how well intentioned, this is still blame shifting to individuals.

Oh boy, space peonage! What will capitalism think of next?