Insert Norm Macdonald clip about how he disagreed with Patton Oswalt that Cosby’s hypocrisy was the worst part, but that instead it was all the rape.

The worst part is probably his terrible actions.

This comment has “two kids in a trenchcoat” energy

You can’t support a game if you can’t afford to pay the people working on it. If a game’s commercial trajectory is in a steep decline and your alternate revenue streams are insufficient, you can’t afford to support that game.

Clownfish TV? Was their not a Quartering or Doomcock video to share with shitty opinion?

This guy gets it. That IGN rant read like something you’d might find on a alt-right blog.

“Six Months Later” is a regular Kotaku feature that this site has been doing for years.

SNW is fantastic, Picard S3 is great, Lower Decks is phenomenal, Prodigy was awesome.

Gladiator 2!

Simply shocking to hear something anti-labor from a man who gets slaves on loan from his cult.

If Nintendo wanted to avoid articles like this, it would have been very easy to do so.

Seconded. Beyond is the easy best of the Kelvin films, and one of the best Trek films period, because it just straight up recaptures the spirit of the Original Series. It’s also the only one of those films that feels like it’s making maximal use of the whole ensemble, and not just putting it all on Pine and Quinto’s…

I mean, sure, it’s not an indicator of whether you support trans rights or not; playing it just means that you care so little about supporting trans rights and so much about satisfying your nostalgia that you’re not even willing to not play a game.

There’s a difference between being an “irredeemable demon” and “saying you care more about playing a video game than anti-trans bigotry”. The former is hyperbole, the latter is just an observation. If that observation makes the person playing feel bad, that’s a feeling they should work out for themselves.

There’s also…

Transphobes: Wow, trans people are always so dramatic. MAYBE I’d support them if they didn’t act like victims all the time.

I was wondering, who was this supercut made for, anyway? Almost everyone watching already knows the backstory, and for the few that don't, it was probably a confusing mish-mash of characters.

You are indeed correct from a general perspective, but not a legal one. From Wikipedia:

Yes, but so is commentators spewing a bunch of bad-faith nonsense.