The motivation of the band has been so confusing. Like, you’re already changing your name, pick something else.

Oh wow now I remember how much I hate the music.

2900 is like free soloing the Dawn Wall

One more data point to support my thesis “since competative activities are impossible to fully objectively quantify, high-level competition is by its nature prone to cheats, trolls, and toxicity.”

I like how they include “server issues” and “gas fees” as part of FUD.

I wish one of these shows had the chutzpa to write a character off a show in the same manner that the actor was fired.

Aren’t there regulations about the shape of cars which prevent them from having such sharp angles?

We look forward to sharing more as the film heads into production after a lengthy development period.

It feels like they’re just making a multi-Doctor story for the 60th, but chatter about it leaked out by way of a game of telephone rather than though the standard rumor mill, and filtered though the toxic part of the fandom’s desire for a “correction” to go along with RTD’s new tenure.

I also see your point 👍. It’s ultimately a matter of editorial direction.

I always find it funny how the entertainment industry produces so many works of fiction where people do “soulless office jobs” for some nefarious company with absolutely no understanding whatsoever what they’re contributing to.

Honestly, I disagree. Let streaming culture develop its own gossip magazine industry separate from gaming culture. Enough people are interested I guess, so let them enjoy it, but it has as much to do with video games as Leonardo DiCaprio’s yacht parties have to do with movies.

for reasons that are unclear

Okay, so say the fraud happened a few transactions ago (this is not known to be the case), Paul can still get it sorted out because with it being such an obvious fake, the company that “certified” it can be held responsible (at least for the cost of their services). The seller can be compelled to reverse the sale (you…

Okay, well, if the parties are known, then he should just request a refund, and that buyer should seek relief from whoever they bought it from, and both should seek relief from the authentication company, who is guilty of malpractice (they charge for their services).

I’m not going to watch his video where he may or may not address this, but did the seller he bought these from just disappear into the night? Like, there’s an open-and-shut fraud case to be made here. Did a third-party facilitate the sale? Did he just fork over a briefcase of cash in a back alley somewhere?

The line was “on a contemporary Star Trek show” not “among all contemporary Star Trek shows.” The standard the writer is setting here is that Discovery’s efforts (which are linked within this article) isn’t enough, and that no Star Trek show should be without significant LGBTQ represenation.

they also kinda did it with Luke Skywalker

I feel like if the people in charge at G4 didn’t want that vibe, maybe they shouldn’t have revitalized the G4 brand? So much about G4 was gross and sexist, so it should be no surprise that its fans expected more of the same. Sure, maybe updated a bit, but of course the people most excited about “G4 is back!” are toxic.

Actually, the best way to cheat at Wordle is just to post this on Twitter: