Yes, Ro, the Starfleet-turned-Maquis, would have been *excellent* on Voyager.

Yeah, it’s not a popular opinion, I know, but I just haven’t seen any of Forbes’ characters show enough depth to property test her talents. It’s not that she hasn’t been given range, I guess, it’s just that she often has to play at the extremes rather than with the subtleties.

That’s what I hated about Endgame, the utter punting on any any attempt to make it work.

Yeah! What kind of asshole would sit in judgement of everyone else like that? Check out this recent egregious example:

Kira wasn’t just a good character, she was one of DS9's most astounding achievements, compared to Ro who is a kind of shallow 90s Riot Girl stereotype, which is why so many of her episodes featured a regular or guest star melting her icy heart. Moreover, Nana Visitor is just a better actor than Michelle Forbes, who I…

Yeah, I really liked that scene, but it kinda pulls the string on the fact that everyone should have figured it out.

This is oddly revealing of the fact that these movies tend to treat their A-list actors like babies when it comes to the needs of the script (see: Mystique suddenly being perfectly comfortable with donning her much-hated human disguise).

Into the Spider-Verse also used 616 and 1610 numbers because they’re iconic for fans even though these are not entirely the comics versions of Peter and Miles.

This is the real first evidence I’ve seen that the Mysterio in this movie is a total charlatan.

Yeah, I really did not understand the Washington DC detour in Homecoming. Like, why couldn’t that have been in Manhattan or the Bronx? Sure, you’d lose a bit of the “tour group” element, but the story wouldn’t be different if Spider-Man saved his friends from the Rainbow Room at Rockefeller Center.

Spider-Man: Homecoming, Tom Holland’s debut

That’s not a logical fallacy. That’s called “an opinion.”

Oh yeah, I see how that’s a problem. The trick to that is to... spend it?

My argument is that 20,000 is a larger number than zero. That’s literally the extent of my argument.

So yes, my point is about value and in a way I am saying be more choosey with how you throw away your money.

Wait... did you think I was arguing that people should horde all the money they don’t spend on lottery tickets and be buried with it??

But what good would that $20k do for them otherwise

Oh, I was confused because buying lottery tickets is not a “leisure activity,” it’s simply a waste of money built on psychological fraud.

Why do I have to answer that?

There’s no real harm spending a few bucks a month on the lottery as long as you don’t think you’ll win.