Go under how? They aren't in any danger of going out of business as far as I know. They're just getting out of the console game industry.
Go under how? They aren't in any danger of going out of business as far as I know. They're just getting out of the console game industry.
You couldn't possible be more off base.
And yet again, here you are. Don't complain about a process you're complicit in.
You made the initial claim, which implies you can make the argument to support that claim. You, as of yet, have not supported that claim at all. They burden of proof lies with the accuser.
Bingo.
Yet here you are.
The burden of proof isn't on me to disprove its stupidity. It's on you to explain why it's stupid...or at least, why it's any stupider than the sex that people have in real life every single day. You're the one making the claim.
Am I the only one who hates when people ask "am I the only one" knowing full well that there are 7 billion people in the world and that no matter the context they are never the only one to do anything?
Been saying this since season 1 finished: The chemistry between Woody and Matt was 90% of the draw for the show. Without them they've got basically no chance to catch that lightning in a bottle again.
Because they're made by human beings.
How is that hypocritical? Why shouldn't we be okay with this?
Almost as childish as all the whining about how childish it is.
Eh, I tried the first one, but I found it to be pretty incoherent. Might have been the translation, though.
I can definitely argue that sex on a unicorn isn't stupid. Furthermore, I can argue that a whole lot of actual sex that people actually have is equally—if not more—stupid, so why shouldn't that be acknowledged in video games?
I don't know that I've ever read a comic that I would deem "necessary."
No, his constituents are. Or were in 2005. Did you even read the article?
Because cruel and unusual punishment is ostensibly still illegal in this country. n
I disagree. It wasn't representative of any retail product, and it wasn't even marketed as a demo. It was a free game as far as PSN was concerned. For all practical purposes it was a free game that just happened to include a Silent Hills teaser as a reward for beating it. And Konami has taken that free game away for…
Yes it is, or it wouldn't be trolling.
And this one had no timer. There was never any indication that it was a limited demo. It's incredibly bad PR, and just flat out fucking rude, to give away an awesome thing to people and then take it away from them for no good reason.