Clickbait: Nothing Means Anything

They might lay eggs.

A Princess that is also a union worker.

To be fair, when one lacks depth perception, it’s difficult to pivot smoothly.

So, I get kind of sick of these types of headlines because they remind me of “WATCH THIS LIBTARD GET OWNED ON FOX NEWS” and it’s just...nothing. This isn’t really a “meltdown.” This is her being the same as she always is. Yestreday wasn’t a “very bad day” for her. All of her days consist of her having to defend the…

It’s not shocking at all. Nor is it shocking that the WH press secretary is, apparently, completely incapable of pivoting even as smoothly as, say, a first-year poli-sci or debate student.

“isn’t it ‘interesting’ that Sarah Huckabee Sanders answered a question about racist police violence by going off on a wild, panicked tangent about the economy and border security?”

If you leave too much space between the words, they can wriggle out of their cages.

If you want to know how Trump fits into christian theology, just read the book of Revelation (in particular, the description of the beast).

“We didn’t think we elected St. Joseph” is exactly the sort of thing my conservative family were saying this weekend. The same people that stroked out when Barry O. wore a tan suit or put his feet on the desk. The delusional hypocrisy is eating my brain.

Trump isn’t worried that his alleged extra-marital dalliances will hurt the evangelical Christian support for him

Maybe she could just start telling people that she’s 1/16th Native American, or that she’s really scared of clowns. Those are less harmful things that uninteresting people like to do.

That is if you take her word at face value.

Yeah nope. Plenty of priests are having sex with consenting adults. There was a whole miniscandal about it a few years ago (it was primarily an internal scandal because priests running around having sex with other consenting adults isn’t all that interesting to everyone else). Part of the ridiculousness of the…

It’s adorable that you think priests don’t have sex.

Fairly wide spread view, but not mine, for what it’s worth. We know for a fact that Trump gets his sexual needs met, better than most of us would like (and Stormy might soon provide additional receipts), and he’s certainly doing his fair share of damage.

No.

Or, ACE, your friend is kind of uninteresting and thinks that this makes her interesting. For a fun test, she can go with out this sex that she does not need.

If she’s not having sex because she needs to or wants, I guess she’s just doing neighbourly favours. 

Honestly never really heard of asexuality until Bojack Horseman, so I wasn’t really familiar with a definition. I just thought it meant you don’t have sex. But her friend saying she doesn’t need sex, so she’s asexual is bullshit. Who needs sex? And if she doesn’t need it then she should stop doing it for a few years…