You’re very logical. There is no reason for you to be rude - it just shows that you have no argument.

Adaptation is also learning.

Adaptation is also learning.

Ownership is also a learned behavior. We agree here. I am sorry about what happened but we are not in disagreement.

LOL Nah I’ve been around for a while. I know you want to discredit me badly, but you don’t have to be rude just because we disagree.

Please read through the threads and tell me again, when people are telling me that it is “biology” and that their “hormones” made them that way, that I am laser-focused on the wrong definition and being defensive.

I know that. But if you read through the threads, people were arguing that it is “biological.” that it is their “nature.” It’s really scary to me that bunch of people were fighting so hard to silence me, calling me an MRA, just because I disagree with biological essentialism.

Serious question and not trolling - I’ve been wondering this a lot: if we accept a trans female who was born a man but identify as a woman, without any biological evidence, why can’t people be transracial and identify as black or asian if they grew up in that culture, even though they are biologically not?

I see where you are coming from, and I would agree - even though a lot of the threads I’m mentioning argue that it IS inherent and that’s the only reason why I have been arguing back. But I don’t feel comfortable saying “men are more violent and dangerous than women” for the same reason why I don’t feel comfortable…

When I saw your ID, my hand immediately moved to the dismiss button.

That is a fair argument. However, I still don’t feel like it’s fair to say that men are inherently violent. If we disagree on that, that’s fine with me.

That is a fair argument. However, I still don’t feel like it’s fair to say that men are inherently violent. If we disagree on that, that’s fine with me.

I know that. I still don’t feel like it’s fair to say that violence is inherent to men.

I understand what you are saying, but I don’t agree with you. For example, the “racial generalization” that Asian men have smaller penises than U.S men are generally true in various statistics. (And yes, this time I have links if you need them). That does not mean that it is OK to continue to state that fact to…

Again, I don’t believe science should be glossed over. See below.

I agree with your points, I don’t think I ever said basic biology is totally moot. I just mean that human beings are evolved more than to be entirely reduced to biology only. Because when someone is saying that violence is inherent to men because it’s “in their nature” to be violent - then what’s the point of working…

Yes. I agree with that too.

Thank you for graciously disagreeing. I’m genuinely curious though, if you believe that men are inherently more violent than women, then what do you think about people who are intersexed - are they neutral? Also, what do you think is the solution - should we just stop fighting for equality or inclusion because men…

Same here, for a lot of people think if I don’t agree with someone, that must mean I’m MRA or should be bullied into not speaking. I know the statistics and I believe and know it. I just don’t agree that it is inherent.

Also, unlike those animals who are primal, we are animals who can actually use logic, which means that we can do better than being reduced just to our biological instincts.