It doesn’t matter when or how Fox ran this. They believed the story because it confirms their preconceptions, and their brains won’t process anything that doesn’t. At best, you’ll get “it was true even if this specific incident wasn’t.”

This is as a vanity a vanity project as could possibly be imagined.

It’s worth pointing out that the initiative lost by 173,000 votes out of 942,000 cast. There was just no way a recount was ever going to swing that.

Savage

I can’t wait to hear how this shot is the Mark of the Beast and formulated from a proprietary blend of aborted fetuses, microchips, and George Soros’s ball sweat.

Fair. I mean, he absolutely groomed her, and they have four kids who did nothing to be put into this situation (beyond the oldest not wrapping it first). He has a record of alcohol abuse and violence.

I’ve always been faithful in my marriage

“Free speech is under assault from the Left!” I shriek as I persecute teachers for crimethink.

Reading all the triggered tweets from the blue-check-stans the last day or so has at least been entertaining.

I mean, true to an extent, but this court has only gotten started. When they toss out Chevron next term, that’s going to break large portions of the administrative state we’ve come to take for granted in terms of enforcing federal environmental and non-discrimination regulations.

Not hard, actually. It would work similar to how it works at the appellate level, that one 9-vote panel decision is binding on any other 9-vote panel, and it takes an en banc decision to overrule precedent.

It’s all about the framing, and it won’t happen overnight. We just need to shift the Overton window by talking about it.

This discussion needs to begin with a review of the first sentence of Article III.

Not that I have a problem with the basic idea here, but some people are just going to steal cars to do takeovers if this becomes a thing.

S0 it’s supposed to be used in “the field”? What happens to that wheel the first time you drop it in the dirt?

At some point, someone will stand their ground over a charging spot.

They already have. It was almost the first thing his side said afterward. 

“Similar architecture” = “has a battery and motor that drives the wheels”

We can laugh at this, but “sovereign citizenry” is at its heart a grift on the same level as peddling nonsense cures for autism.

Her point is that her side has the Supreme Court. That’s the win she’s referring to.