You would think, but then again, you would think it would be stupid for them to say no to any developer that wants to add a great game to their system, but the Launch Parity clause does just that...Granted Microsoft was fine with it during the 360 era where they were the primary development platform and had the…

Its not exclusive. Its effectively exclusive. Thats completely different. If the developer wants to put the game on Microsofts platforms, and Microsoft says no, that effectively makes it an exclusive title, even though its not technically. The vast majority of games released on the Playstation first are…

I just read recaps/breakdowns of Microsoft and Sonys conference on here and a few other sites, but thats exactly how I felt reading about Microsoft's. It was yawn after yawn. I really thought Microsoft was going to hit with some big guns this E3 but it was underwhelming at best. Now Sonys was not amazing, but it…

My point was that its entirely capable of it, which was the original discussion, not that games are not utilizing it.

I know it was ported, but the controls, to me, felt quite good. I had it for the PC and for the PS1 when it came out (not years later trying to play from nostalgia) and I remember enjoying it much more on the PS1. Thats my opinion though, the point was that Diablo 2 was the only one not to show up on consoles.

You say nondescript, but it sticks out like a sore thumb. Its a odd sized *glossy* (that's the worst bit), rounded edge, out of place object. Its not about appearing adult-like, its about hardware that looks like a childs toy does not match any of the other hardware one normally has in, around, above, or under their…

To be fair, Diablo 1 was on the Playstation 1, so Diablo 3 is not the first console Diablo.

Actually they showed you doing multiplayer on Lego Marvel PS4, where the second player was using the vita (and had their own independent screen) where the first player was using the controller. This feature never actually materialized in the retail game (much like 3D in FFXIV never showed up) but it was possible.

Firstly, I don't put bumper stickers on my car, because it ruins its look. I don't wear a hot pink shirt because I don't like its color. I don't buy a WiiU (in part) because it looks ugly. I am sure, in your daily life, there are hundreds of similar choices you make.

That does not actually mean anything. For example, FFXIV was originally slated PC and 360 (and all videos and such were of those two platforms, with PS3 to come down the road) but because Microsoft would not budge on one of their policies, it became PC and PS3 (then PS4)

I never said most people buy consoles for aesthetic reasons, you pulled this out of thin air. I said it is a factor, one of many that I listed. I personally would not want the WiiU, or hell, any Nintendo console, to be in my living room, because they all look like toys. To be fair the WiiU looks less like a toy…

You can, in fact, do this with the Vita and PS4. Its not using Remote Play (which is just a streaming system) its using the second screen functionality in conjunction with the dedicated buttons. There are no games out right now that make use of it, but there were actually some PS3 games that let you do this with the…

PS4 and PC, not Xbox because of Microsofts policy.

Not correct. Not likely to be on the Xbox because of Microsofts own policy that forbids it.

It is not likely to. Microsoft has a policy that prevents it, since it launched on a competitors platform first.

Except Microsoft themselves with their own policy that forbids it.

It is effectively an exclusive because of Microsofts policy forbidding games to release on Xbox that released on a competitors platform first.

It will likely come out for PC, but Microsofts policy forbids releasing a game on the Xbox that was released on a competitors platform first.

Likely never because Microsoft has a policy that forbids it if it released on a competitors platform first.

Microsofts policy effectively makes it exclusive unless you are talking about PC.