thedevilsjester
thedevilsjester
thedevilsjester

Sony doesn't have "something planned". The PSP and PS Vita have offered second screen (and off screen play) capabilities since the PS3. With the PS4 we get these plus smart phones can act as a second screen device as well. The big difference is ITS OPTIONAL. Which of course means less devs will make use of it, but it

Because those two things are mutually exclusive? And they have something to do with the topic at hand? Its quite obvious what your mental age is from your posts. You should keep of the internet until you grow up a bit.

You took the word inception and modified it, trying to make a hybrid word but the word doesn't mean what you think it does and you actually intended to reference a specific mechanic in the movie called inception.

Inception means the origin of an idea, not something within something.

The best MMOs, and the ones with the longest profitable lifespan are the pay to play ones. These are funded by the company itself and not by investors and can count on a consistent income so that they can staff appropriately. This makes the potential for a P2P game greater than that of a microtransaction game (I

I loved FFX but Blitzball was just garbage. It was fun for the first couple games and then of was just the same thing over and over. Really simple to win every time with little to no effort (had to play hundreds of games for wakkas ball and I did most of them half asleep, felt like the equivalent of crafting in a

It worked for the Wii!

Considering most people that get a Nintendo system do so for the first party titles, having one of your major first party titles sell to less than 25% of your user base, is disappointing at best.

It gets a pass because with COD you can sell the game, buy a used copy or trade it/loan it to a friend and they can play it online. Your initial purchase (new) of the game included the cost for a reasonable amount of online play. This is why games like this started doing online passes.

Most of the time this comes up it is in reference to Netflix and other services like that. Services for which MS does nothing additional to justify the added cost. I have PS+ but only because the 'free' games are worth the price ten times over. If it was just an online play service, like Live is (or is-ish now with

You are misinformed the 40 GB launch units that had emulated PS2 BC only emulated one of the two main chips (the CPU iirc) and it still had the other chip on board (the GPU iirc). When they finally removed the last PS2 hardware from the system later on, they also removed PS2 BC because it was not fully emulated. The

I have not played since the 2.1 patch, I have played since closed beta (1.0) onward and stopped shortly before 2.1 and have had zero PS3 lag that I don't also get on my PC. I would say, again, that its a latency issue, network connection, because in 2.1 they split the data centers, which I am sure decreased latency.

8 GB of GDDR5 (educate yourself) is all that great for gaming. Its not great for writing documents, or browsing the web, but we are talking about gaming specifically. All that other stuff I mentioned? No its not possible. Oh sure you can simulate some of it by having your OS auto run steam (try to simulate

The PC may have exclusives, but except for a rare few (LoL and Sim City fall into the junk category for me), the consoles have all the games I want, and I can use a controller for every single one of them.

As the Nintendo has proved time and again, More Games doesnt equal More Quality Games, but that is neither here nor there. My PC doesnt support ~80% of my 200 game library, so this myth about PC support is just that, a myth. Last decades games, are last decades games, and you are lucky if you get them to work.

Some game types do not require very much power, racers, many sports games, so its easy to do 1080p at 60FPS and cap it at that. Its likely (because the specs are higher) that the PS4 version has the capability of doing more, but the game style being what it is, doesnt need that extra power.

Does this theoretical PC have 8 GB of GDDR5? Does it have a small profile that can fit in an entertainment center? Or is it still a PC sitting next to the TV? Does this PC allow you to turn it on, choose a game, and play, without picking up a keyboard and mouse? Does every game on this PC fully support controller

If you think this, then its obvious that you do not understand what the actual problem is. All things being equal (same game, for example) with the only real variable being the platform, the PS4 versions of nearly (if not all) cross platform games have better graphical performance. Be it frame rate or resolution.

Yeah but if the Xbox drops to 24 FPS at times, do you really think unlocking the 30 FPS cap would really make much of a difference to its max? It seems like pushing 30 FPS is as much as the Xbox version can handle.

Just because a game is on another platform doesn't mean that you can't wish your platform had said game.