Yes, and I do asked it EXACTLY that way because some of Watson's defenders publicly stated that it didn't matter IF he existed or not because all that mattered was what Watson said.

Okay, are you really that stupid (well, you seem to be an admirer of Greg "The male brain is a female brain damaged by testosterone" Laden, so....) or are you just playing one on the Internet?

Yes, that's called asking a question, you do know what "?" means, right? (see, using it again).

That's not skepticism that's conjecture. But keep trying, sooner or later you must actually end up being verifably correct, though if that happens in the next decade is anybodies guess.

Oh oh? Are you already backtracking from: "I call all women liars" to "you call all women liars when it's convenient for me"?

Again, show me where I said she lied about the elevator? Please, I am curious.

Huh? What "argument" do you think I made? Please do tell, or can't you find that right now either?

Of course you don't remember because it never happened, but hey, don't let reality intrude on your emotions. If you KNOW you're right and if you know I am an asshole then that is all that matters. Let's not get bogged down an attempt to try and be somewhat objective here, it's a lost cause.

I had a much more...... un-PC like comment in mind, then thought better :P

Can you provide a link to "Elevator Guy" making that statement? Because I have nowhere found anything about this not even when looking on Watson's blog. At least there I would have expected her to point it out.

Odds are that's still one of the designs he approved. He's dead less than a year and I would bet their cycle is at least 12 months.

I am on a Mac Pro and have my iTunes library (both DB and content) stored on the internal drives, it's not a very fast experience most of the time either.

Actually I will pick one now. I have been thinking about this for the last two days and here is my position: Dawkins was absolutely correct in his posting. He sent it in the middle of a few thousand posts that were debating about the validity Watson's claim and both sides had and wouldn't be getting anywhere. All the…

And you would be thinking wrong. My problem is not with her raising the issues or even want to raise awareness to it. My problem is in her methods and the repeatedly self-victimization in order to score "ethic" points.

Oh snap, what an intelligent comeback from you.

"Hint: she doesn't, she stands as a valuable voice in the skeptic community."

What? Because I don't think his transgression was horrible horrible horrible and for these words he should hang / be burned at the stake I am not critical of him? I GET why he made that remark, the entire elevatorgate and the "discussions" around it were and are utterly stupid. So yeah, I can't blame him for the…

How would you like me to hold him responsible? Hold a book burning? Write a blog post condemning him for writing something that was, at worst, in bad taste? Tweet in outrage over his "totally misogynistic post"?

Dawins was complaining about the absurdity the argument has gotten to, that this was and is misrepresented by certain people isn't surprising though.

What does that "nope" apply to? That Watson is not responsible for what she writes or that I did give you the impression I don't think Dawkins is responsible for what he writes?